Connect with us

Markets

Afreximbank Unveils Programme to Unlock Over $100b Intra-African Investments

Published

on

afreximbank
  • Afreximbank Unveils Programme to Unlock Over $100b Intra-African Investments

By creating and modifying trade finance instruments, the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank), has stated that it hopes to unlock about $100billion worth of investments within the continent, hitherto not mobilised via informal trade and Diaspora funds, through its newly launched Guarantee Programme (AFGAP).

Although the bank said efforts to mobilise untapped investments had started last year with a target of $10billion, it realised that there are more funds to be harnessed considering the success it recorded within the period its mobilisation efforts commenced.

According to the bank, the programme, which has several initiatives, seeks to de-risk intra-African trade by mobilising available resources within the continent rather than struggling to attract foreign direct investment from international agencies and developed countries.

Besides, the bank also reinforced the need to de-commoditise the continent by developing strategies and adapting to changes in the global community, especially as the world switches to data economy.

President of Afreximbank, Dr Benedict Oramah, explained that the move for inclusiveness in the area of trade became important in the light of difficulty in accessing FDIs by many African countries and the need to help the fragmented continent to reap benefits of integration.He spoke at the opening ceremony of the advanced structured trade finance seminar on the Island of Sal in Cape Verde, yesterday.

He added that the trade solutions being unveiled are needed to boost intra-African trade, especially as there are emerging trends in technology, mobile payments and changing data environment. “Resource mobilisation from African sources helps to reduce dependence on foreign liabilities when there is over $1trillion worth of funds within the continent waiting to be harnessed. We need to help ourselves first rather than financing other economies through bonds issuance

“Intra-African trade can only expand if Africa produces more diversified products and if risks associated with the financing of the trade can be adequately mitigated. Industrialisation and export manufacturing have become critical components of the efforts to expand intra-African trade. The role of financing in all of these cannot be overemphasized. Creating the export manufacturing capacities the continent will require billions of dollars in financing the enabling infrastructure as well as the acquisition of the equipment the factories will need.”

Afreximbank also estimates that an amount of about $25billion exists as intra-African trade financing gap annually even today Due to novelty of regional markets, there is the need to create instruments that will mitigate payment risks, including country risks, for traders. Historically, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, international banks had not supported intra-African trade for various reasons: these banks had traditionally favoured commodity financing, which lent itself to the use of classical structured trade financing techniques to mitigate perceived risks in the continent.

Under such structures, the international banks usually assumed the performance risks of African commodity exporters, while transferring the payment risks to Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. This approach contributed in entrenching commodity dependence in Africa as items other than commodities could not be financed. It also contributed to the low levels of intra-African trade given that African buyers rarely qualified as acceptable off-takers under such arrangements.

While these problems persist today, others are emerging. For instance, rising costs of compliance is beginning to constrain access of many African economies to import financing. A cocktail of enhanced regulatory compliance requirements and the emerging Basel IV and IFRS 9 are likely to further worsen the situation. What all these mean is that bankers doing business in Africa have to be adaptive and responsive to the needs of the continent and the evolving operating environment. It is no longer possible to operate as if things are not changing. While Africa pioneered FINTECH, the speed of its evolution is creating challenges and opportunities for trade finance banks around the globe.

“With new payment platforms emerging daily as well as gradual acceptance of digital currencies, letters of credit may not be relevant in the near future. This seminar will give participants the capacity to structure bankable trade finance deals of varying levels of complexity and will also give them the opportunity to network and exchange ideas,” he said.

On his part, the Minister of Finance, Cape Verde, Olavo Correia, hinged the growth of the continent’s economy on trade facilitation and development of free markets that aid the transition of several informal trades to the formal platform.

“A unified market is key and Afreximbank as an institution is crucial to achieving that. We need to look at several sectors that can drive inclusiveness. We are doing our best as a country to connect several sectors and islands,” he added.

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Dip Amidst Middle East Tensions, Market Reaction Limited

Published

on

Oil

Oil prices fell on Monday as market participants reevaluated their risk premiums in the wake of Iran’s weekend attack on Israel, which the Israeli government said caused limited damage.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigerian oil is priced,  dipped by 50 cents, or 0.5%, to $89.95 a barrel while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil fell by 52 cents, or 0.6%, to $85.14 a barrel.

The attack, involving over 300 missiles and drones, marked the first assault on Israel from another country in more than three decades. It heightened concerns over a potential broader regional conflict impacting oil traffic through the Middle East.

However, Israel’s Iron Dome defense system intercepted many of the missiles, and the attack resulted in only modest damage and no reported loss of life.

Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING, noted that the market had largely priced in the potential attack in the days leading up to it. The limited damage and the absence of casualties suggest that Israel’s response may be more measured, which could help stabilize the oil market.

Iran, a major oil producer within OPEC, currently produces over 3 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil. The potential risks include stricter enforcement of oil sanctions and the possibility of Israeli targeting of Iran’s energy infrastructure, according to ING.

Nevertheless, OPEC possesses over 5 million bpd of spare production capacity, which could help mitigate any supply disruptions.

Analysts from ANZ Research and Citi Research have suggested that further significant impact on oil prices would require a material disruption to supply, such as constraints on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. So far, the Israel-Hamas conflict has not had a notable effect on oil supply.

The market remains watchful of Israel’s response to the attack, which could influence the future trajectory of oil prices and broader geopolitical tensions in the region.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Nigeria’s Crude Oil Production Falls for Second Consecutive Month, OPEC Reports

Published

on

Crude Oil

Nigeria’s crude oil production declined for the second consecutive month in March, according to the latest report from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

Data obtained from OPEC’s Monthly Oil Market Report for April 2024 reveals that Nigeria’s crude oil production depreciated from 1.322 million barrels per day (mbpd) in February to 1.231 mbpd in March.

This decline underscores the challenges faced by Africa’s largest oil-producing nation in maintaining consistent output levels.

Despite efforts to stabilize production, Nigeria has struggled to curb the impact of oil theft and pipeline vandalism, which continue to plague the industry.

The theft and sabotage of oil infrastructure have resulted in significant disruptions, contributing to the decline in crude oil production observed in recent months.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) recently disclosed alarming statistics regarding oil theft incidents in the country.

According to reports, the NNPCL recorded 155 oil theft incidents within a single week, these incidents included illegal pipeline connections, refinery operations, vessel infractions, and oil spills, among others.

The persistent menace of oil theft poses a considerable threat to Nigeria’s economy and its position as a key player in the global oil market.

The illicit activities not only lead to revenue losses for the government but also disrupt the operations of oil companies and undermine investor confidence in the sector.

In response to the escalating problem, the Nigerian government has intensified efforts to combat oil theft and vandalism.

However, addressing these challenges requires a multi-faceted approach, including enhanced security measures, regulatory reforms, and community engagement initiatives.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Edge Higher Amidst Fear of Middle East Conflict

Published

on

Crude Oil

Amidst growing apprehensions of a potential conflict in the Middle East, oil prices have inched higher as investors anticipate a strike from Iran.

The specter of a showdown between Iran or its proxies and Israel has sent tremors across the oil market as traders brace for possible supply disruptions in the region.

Brent crude oil climbed above the $90 price level following a 1.1% gain on Wednesday while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) hovered near $86.

The anticipation of a strike, believed to be imminent by the United States and its allies, has cast a shadow over market sentiment. Such an escalation would follow Iran’s recent threat to retaliate against Israel for an attack on a diplomatic compound in Syria.

The trajectory of oil prices this year has been heavily influenced by geopolitical tensions and supply dynamics. Geopolitical unrest, coupled with ongoing OPEC+ supply cuts, has propelled oil prices nearly 18% higher since the beginning of the year.

However, this upward momentum is tempered by concerns such as swelling US crude stockpiles, now at their highest since July, and the impact of a hot US inflation print on Federal Reserve rate-cut expectations.

Despite the bullish sentiment prevailing among many of the world’s top traders and Wall Street banks, with some envisioning a return to $100 for the global benchmark, caution lingers.

Macquarie Group has cautioned that Brent could enter a bear market in the second half of the year if geopolitical events fail to materialize into actual supply disruptions.

“The current geopolitical environment continues to provide support to oil prices,” remarked Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy for ING Groep NV in Singapore. However, he added, “further upside is limited without a fresh catalyst or further escalation in the Middle East.”

The rhetoric from Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, reaffirming a vow to retaliate against Israel, has only heightened tensions in the region.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending