Connect with us

Markets

Nigeria @ 58: Poor Management Puts Economy at Risk

Published

on

  • Nigeria @ 58: Poor Management Puts Economy at Risk

It is trite to say that Nigeria has the potential to become a major player in the global economy by virtue of its human and natural resource endowments.

However, this potential, at best, has remained untapped. At worse, the hope has been dashed by successive governments with the promise of better days for the citizenry receding like a mirage shortly after a new government takes over power.

After a shift from agriculture to crude oil and gas in the late 1960s, Nigeria’s growth has continued to be driven by consumption and high oil prices.

Previous economic policies had left the country ill-prepared for the recent collapse in crude oil prices and production. The structure of the economy remains highly import-dependent, consumption-driven and undiversified.

Figures from the National Bureau of Statistics, for instance, show that oil accounts for more than 95 per cent of exports and foreign exchange earnings while the manufacturing sector accounts for less than one per cent of total exports.

Economic experts are of the view that the high growth recorded between 2011 and 2015, which averaged 4.8 per cent per annum and mainly driven by higher oil prices, was largely non-inclusive.

This is because majority of Nigerians have remained under the burden of poverty, inequality and unemployment.

In the same vein, general economic performance has been seriously undermined by deplorable infrastructure, corruption and mismanagement of public funds.

According to experts, decades of consumption and high oil price-driven growth have led to an economy with a positive but jobless growth trajectory.

After more than a decade of economic growth, the sharp and continuous decline in crude oil production volume and oil prices since mid-2014, along with a failure to diversify the sources of revenue and foreign exchange in the economy, led to a recession in the second quarter of 2016.

When President Muhammadu Buhari took over the mantle of leadership of Nigeria on May 29, 2015, there were high expectations from Nigerians that the long awaited messiah had come.

Buhari’s administration came with three major promises to Nigerians – fighting insecurity, tackling corruption and reviving the economy.

To revive the economy, the administration promised to pursue an economic diversification programme that would make Nigeria to produce what it needs and consume what it produces.

This is expected to be achieved through targeted spending in key areas such as infrastructure, agriculture and solid minerals as encapsulated in the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan.

In the face of dwindling resources, experts said they expected the government to come up with fresh ideas that could turn the situation around rather than borrowing.

And many are afraid that Nigeria is relapsing into unsustainable debt situation. For instance, in the last three years, both external and domestic loans have been growing at both the federal and state levels.

The Federal Government and the 36 states as well as the Federal Capital Territory grew the country’s external loan commitment from $10.32bn in June 2015 to $22.07bn in March 2018.

This reflects an increase of $11.76bn or 113.94 per cent growth in the country’s external debt within a period of 33 months. The period is within the presidency of Muhammadu Buhari as he took over the reins of government on May 29, 2015.

In naira terms, statistics obtained from the Debt Management Office in Abuja showed that the country’s external loans rose from N2.03tn as of June 31, 2015 to N6.75tn in March 31, 2018. This reflects an increase of 232.51 per cent.

The difference when the external debt is denominated in naira reflects the beating which the local currency has taken since 2014 following the dwindling of the nation’s capacity to accumulate foreign currency as a result of changing fortunes of crude oil, the main foreign exchange earner of the country.

The domestic debt of the country rose from N10.09tn as of June 2015 to N15.96tn as of March 2018. This reflects an increase of N5.87tn or an increase of 58.23 per cent within the timeframe of analysis.

Taken together, the country’s public debt rose from N12.12tn as of June 31, 2015 to N22.71tn as of March 31, 2018. This reflects a difference of N10.59tn or a percentage increase of 87.37 per cent within a period of 33 months.

Broken down, the Federal Government’s component of the domestic loans stood at N12.58tn while states’ component stood at N3.38tn as of March 2018.

Some finance and economic experts in their assessment of the economy warned that weak economic fundamentals currently being shown by the Nigerian economy was putting the country’s exit from recession under threat.

Nigeria’s economy exited recession in 2017 after suffering contraction for five consecutive quarters.

They expressed concern that Nigeria’s exit from recession might be under threat as the economy recorded growth rate of 1.95 per cent and 1.5 per cent during the first and the second quarter of this year, respectively.

This slowdown, according to them, emanated from the oil sector with strong linkages to employment and growth.

The late implementation of the 2018 budget, weakening demand and consumer spending, rising contractor debt, and low minimum wage are some of the risks to output growth.

Others are the impact of flooding on agricultural output, continued security challenges in the North-East and North-Central zones and growing level of sovereign debt.

The Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Mr Godwin Emefiele, who spoke after a recent Monetary Policy Committee meeting, warned about the precarious danger of the nation’s economy.

He said, “The MPC observed that despite the underperformance of key monetary aggregates, headline inflation inched up to 11.23 per cent in 2018 from 11.14 per cent in July 2018.

“The near time upside risks to inflation remain the dissipation of the base effect expected from 2019 election-related spending, continued herdsmen attacks on farmers and episode of flooding, which destroyed farmlands and affected food supply ultimately.

“Relative stability has returned to the foreign exchange market buoyed by the robust external reserves with inflation trending downward for the 18th consecutive month.”

Emefiele also said, “The gains so far achieved appeared to be under threat following the new data, which provides evidence of weakening fundamentals.

“The committee identified rise in inflation, pressure on the external reserves created by the capital flow reversals as the current challenges to growth. It noted that the underlying pressures had started rebuilding and capital flows reversals had intensified as shown by the bearish trend in the equities market even though the exchange rate remained very stable.

“The committee was concerned that the exit from the recession might be under threat as the economy slid to 1.95 per cent and 1.5 per cent during the first and the second quarter 2018, respectively.”

In his assessment of the economy, a former Acting Managing Director, Unity Bank Plc, Mr Rislanudeen Mohammed, said Nigeria’s exit from recession was due largely to recovery of the oil sector as well as relative peace in the Niger Delta.

He said, “At the peak of the activities of so called Niger Delta Avengers, oil output went below one million barrels a day as against current level of 1.8 to two million barrels a day and the economy sank into recession, the worst since 1987.

“Being still dependent on oil for over 70 per cent of our foreign exchange earnings, disruptions in oil production will distort our recovery efforts and threaten the relative successes of the economic recovery and growth plan.

“It may also create crisis in the foreign exchange market with potential for imported, cost push inflation.”

On what could be done to stimulate the economy, Mohammed said, “We need to be careful with foreign loans unless they are transaction-tied and with capacity to repay themselves given our present elevated foreign and local borrowings.

“We need to be careful in always looking at our debt to revenue ratio and not only debt to GDP ratio while accessing new loans. We should also be careful not to get over leveraged with Chinese debt with its attendant concentration risk.

“We should ensure that projects are productive with potential multiplier effect on the real sector of the economy to support growth and employment generation rather than white elephant, vanity projects that will only satisfy ego and sentiments.”

He added, “Going forward, Nigeria must insist China invests directly in Nigeria through special arrangements like Public-Private Partnership and some special concessions to support our growth and technology transfer.

“We should discourage the $5bn import financing line offered by China as that will only help in worsening the terms of trade that have for years favoured the Chinese. The relationship should be mutually beneficial.”

In his assessment of the economy, a former Director-General, Abuja Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Chijioke Ekechukwu, said the country’s over-reliance on oil portended danger for the economy.

This, according to him, is because the oil sector is not only volatile but outside the control of the Nigerian government.

He said, “The score card of the economy in the last one year can be measured by how well the macro economy has fared. The GDP has grown marginally, contributed by the oil sector, service and agricultural sectors.

“The government has also had various programmes and incentives to encourage the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises.

“However, unemployment rate still remains high. Inflation rate though came low consistently in the last nine months until recently, it has not reflected in the real prices of goods and services.

“The growth in the economy is expected to be stalled from now until a new political government takes over next year but the increased price of oil currently will reduce the adverse effect of election.”

Beyond the economic indicators, an expert in telecommunications and information telecommunications, Dr. Silvanus Ehikioya, said it was important for the government to begin to put square pegs in square holes.

Ehikioya, a former director at the Nigerian Communications Commission, said it was necessary for government to recruit good managers of the economy no matter where they came from.

He added that provincial approach to governance could not revive an economy in a shambles.

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Climb on Renewed Middle East Concerns and Saudi Supply Signals

Published

on

Crude oil

As global markets continue to navigate through geopolitical uncertainties, oil prices rose on Monday on renewed concerns in the Middle East and signals from Saudi Arabia regarding its crude supply.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigeria’s oil is priced, surged by 51 cents to $83.47 a barrel while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil rose by 53 cents to $78.64 a barrel.

The recent escalation in tensions between Israel and Hamas has amplified fears of a widening conflict in the key oil-producing region, prompting investors to closely monitor developments.

Talks for a ceasefire in Gaza have been underway, but prospects for a deal appeared slim as Hamas reiterated its demand for an end to the war in exchange for the release of hostages, a demand rejected by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The uncertainty surrounding the conflict was further exacerbated on Monday when Israel’s military called on Palestinian civilians to evacuate Rafah as part of a ‘limited scope’ operation, sparking concerns of a potential ground assault.

Analysts warned that such developments risk derailing ceasefire negotiations and reigniting geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

Adding to the bullish sentiment, Saudi Arabia announced an increase in the official selling prices (OSPs) for its crude sold to Asia, Northwest Europe, and the Mediterranean in June.

This move signaled the kingdom’s anticipation of strong demand during the summer months and contributed to the upward pressure on oil prices.

The uptick in prices comes after both Brent and WTI crude futures posted their steepest weekly losses in three months last week, reflecting concerns over weak U.S. jobs data and the timing of a potential Federal Reserve interest rate cut.

However, with most of the long positions in oil cleared last week, analysts suggest that the risks are skewed towards a rebound in prices in the early part of this week, particularly for WTI prices towards the $80 mark.

Meanwhile, in China, the world’s largest crude importer, services activity remained in expansionary territory for the 16th consecutive month, signaling a sustained economic recovery.

Also, U.S. energy companies reduced the number of oil and natural gas rigs operating for the second consecutive week, indicating a potential tightening of supply in the near term.

As global markets continue to navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and supply dynamics, investors remain vigilant, closely monitoring developments in the Middle East and their impact on oil prices.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Drop Sharply, Marking Steepest Weekly Decline in Three Months

Published

on

Crude Oil - Investors King

Amidst concerns over weak U.S. jobs data and the potential timing of a Federal Reserve interest rate cut, oil prices record its sharpest weekly decline in three months.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigerian oil is priced, settled 71 cents lower to close at $82.96 a barrel.

Similarly, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil fell 84 cents, or 1.06% to end the week at $78.11 a barrel.

The primary driver behind this decline was investor apprehension regarding the impact of sustained borrowing costs on the U.S. economy, the world’s foremost oil consumer. These concerns were amplified after the Federal Reserve opted to maintain interest rates at their current levels this week.

Throughout the week, Brent experienced a decline of over 7%, while WTI dropped by 6.8%.

The slowdown in U.S. job growth, revealed in April’s data, coupled with a cooling annual wage gain, intensified expectations among traders for a potential interest rate cut by the U.S. central bank.

Tim Snyder, an economist at Matador Economics, noted that while the economy is experiencing a slight deceleration, the data presents a pathway for the Fed to enact at least one rate cut this year.

The Fed’s decision to keep rates unchanged this week, despite acknowledging elevated inflation levels, has prompted a reassessment of the anticipated timing for potential rate cuts, according to Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS.

Higher interest rates typically exert downward pressure on economic activity and can dampen oil demand.

Also, U.S. energy companies reduced the number of oil and natural gas rigs for the second consecutive week, reaching the lowest count since January 2022, as reported by Baker Hughes.

The oil and gas rig count fell by eight to 605, with the number of oil rigs dropping by seven to 499, the most significant weekly decline since November 2023.

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict have somewhat eased as discussions for a temporary ceasefire progress with international mediators.

Looking ahead, the next meeting of OPEC+ oil producers is scheduled for June 1, where the group may consider extending voluntary oil output cuts beyond June if global oil demand fails to pick up.

In light of these developments, money managers reduced their net long U.S. crude futures and options positions in the week leading up to April 30, according to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Rebound After Three Days of Losses

Published

on

Crude oil - Investors King

After enduring a three-day decline, oil prices recovered on Thursday, offering a glimmer of hope to investors amid a volatile market landscape.

The rebound was fueled by a combination of factors ranging from geopolitical developments to supply concerns.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigeria oil is priced, surged by 79 cents, or 0.95% to $84.23 a barrel while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude climbed 69 cents, or 0.87% to $79.69 per barrel.

This turnaround came on the heels of a significant downturn that had pushed prices to their lowest levels since mid-March.

The recent slump in oil prices was primarily attributed to a confluence of factors, including the U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision to maintain interest rates and concerns surrounding stubborn inflation, which could potentially dampen economic growth and limit oil demand.

Also, unexpected data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) revealing a substantial increase in U.S. crude inventories added further pressure on oil prices.

“The updated inventory statistics were probably the most salient price driver over the course of yesterday’s trading session,” said Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM.

Crude inventories surged by 7.3 million barrels to 460.9 million barrels, significantly exceeding analysts’ expectations and casting a shadow over market sentiment.

However, the tide began to turn as ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas gained traction, offering a glimmer of hope for stability in the volatile Middle East region.

The prospect of a ceasefire agreement, spearheaded by Egypt, injected optimism into the market, offsetting concerns surrounding geopolitical tensions.

“As the impact of the U.S. crude stock build and the Fed signaling higher-for-longer rates is close to being fully baked in, attention will turn towards the outcome of the Gaza talks,” noted Vandana Hari, founder of Vanda Insights.

The potential for a resolution in the Israel-Hamas conflict provided a ray of hope, contributing to the positive momentum in oil markets.

Despite the optimism surrounding ceasefire talks, tensions in the Middle East remain palpable, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reiterating plans for a military offensive in the southern Gaza city of Rafah.

The precarious geopolitical climate continues to underpin volatility in oil markets, reminding investors of the inherent risks associated with the commodity.

In addition to geopolitical developments, speculation regarding U.S. government buying for strategic reserves added further support to oil prices.

With the U.S. expressing intentions to replenish the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) at prices below $79 a barrel, market participants closely monitored price movements, anticipating potential intervention to stabilize prices.

“The oil market was supported by speculation that if WTI falls below $79, the U.S. will move to build up its strategic reserves,” highlighted Hiroyuki Kikukawa, president of NS Trading, owned by Nissan Securities.

As oil markets navigate a complex web of geopolitical uncertainties and supply dynamics, the recent rebound underscores the resilience of the commodity in the face of adversity.

While challenges persist, the renewed optimism offers a ray of hope for stability and growth in the oil sector, providing investors with a semblance of confidence amidst a volatile landscape.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending