Connect with us

News

Freedom of Movement Guaranteed For Humans Not For Cows – SAN

Published

on

Cattle farming

Some senior lawyers have faulted the position of the presidency on the open grazing ban in the South.

Some of them described the president’s statement as parochial, sectional and one that is capable of further tearing the country apart.

Mr. John Baiyesea (SAN), who described the statement as part of the bizarre situation the country is dealing with, wondered if such could ever emanate from Buhari.

According to him, such statements are often made under the cover of the presidency.

He said: “It is doubtful if the president knows about such annoying statements, which seem to suggest that he has narrowed his office to the North. I don’t believe that the president will personally support one ethnic group against another or wilfully diminish the scope of his authority. I don’t think he will make himself so irrelevant as president of Nigeria.”

He, however, stated that if the president’s silence to such tribalistic and ethnic posturing of his appointees means acquiescence or approval, then the country is endangered.

“How many times are they to be told (for them to understand), that freedom of movement guaranteed by the constitution is for human beings and not for cows, or animals.

“As long as Fulani herdsmen stay within the law, their freedom of movement is guaranteed. But their cows do not enjoy the same constitutional rights or protections.

“Except for the mischievous intentions of these government officials who are bent on dividing this country, it is too elementary that the constitutional system does not give the rights of people to animals,” he said.

He, however, advised the federal government to be careful not to allow the horrors experienced in Rwanda and Burundi to happen in Nigeria.

Also speaking, Mr. Dayo Akinlaja (SAN), faulted the presidency, saying that the Southern governors acted within the ambit of the law.

He added: “I do not agree with him for the simple reason that it is not in tandem with my previously expressed view that the governors were right in their decision to ban open grazing.

“In a constitutional setting as ours, the issue may have to be referred to the judicial arm of government for resolution. Until that is done, the governors are at liberty to stick to their position.”

Human rights lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), also faulted the presidency and advised the government to study the Grazing Reserves Act of 1964, which provides for the establishment and operation of grazing reserves in the North.

He said since there was a popular demand for the proscription of open grazing, efforts should be made to immediately establish ranches.

“It smacks of brazen official impunity on the part of the presidency to have said that the ban on open grazing is of doubtful legality. Last Friday, the Federal High Court ruled that state governments have the power to enact anti-grazing laws,” he stated.

Constitutional lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), accused Malami of ill-advising the president against the stance of the Southern governors.

He challenged the federal government to sue the governors if it is convinced that their position is legally flawed.

He said: “President Buhari has obviously been ill-advised on the well thought out Southern governors’ stance against open grazing by the attorney-general whose views were made known only two days ago. Buhari, with all humility, is quite wrong to say the Southern governors’ stance is an act of questionable legality.

“If the federal government feels strongly and sure about its puritanical, but legally flawed stance, I challenge the federal government to challenge the governors’ resolutions by suing all the state governors of Nigeria, through the invocation of the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under section 232(1) of the 1999 Constitution.”

Continue Reading
Comments

News

Genetically Modified Foods Dangerous To Your Health, Research Organisation Warns Nigerians 

Published

on

A non-governmental organization that researches into how ugly trend of increasing incidents of chronic degenerative diseases in Nigeria could be prevented, Living Science Foundation (LSF) has warned governments and citizens about major dangers posed by consuming Genetically Modified Organsams (GMOs) foods in the country.

Describing the situation as an urgent environmental-health concern in Nigeria, the group expressed deep concern over ongoing deluge of deployment of GMOs foods in the country, citing adverse health effects such as cancers, organ damage, allergic reactions, antibiotic resistance and reductions in nutritional content for consumers of GMOs foods.

The research-driven foundation stated this at a press conference held as part of activities of the 9th National Conference on Environment and Health (NCEH), holding at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife on Wednesday.

On the impending take-over of Nigeria’s staple foods by GMOs, the statement issued by the Foundation and signed by LSD President, Prof. Joshua Ojo and Chairman of the NCEH Planning Committee, Dr Adeniyi Okinni, noted that “there are very good reasons to doubt the thoroughness of the approval processes for these products in Nigeria,”

They therefore urged relevant authorities in Nigeria to conduct appropriate chronic toxicity testings that transparently ascertain the safety of GM food products before their deployment for public consumption in the country.

“The Living Science Foundation is deeply concerned with the ongoing deluge of deployment of GMO foods in Nigeria.  At the beginning of the year, on January 11, approval was given for the cultivation of GMO TELA Maize in Nigeria. On the heels of this were the announcements that GMO cassava and potatoes are also on their way. Transgenic rice and sorghum are also known to be lurking somewhere in the pipeline. Since 2019, Nigerians have been officially eating the world’s first genetically modified beans (Bt Cowpeas). The frightening implication of all these, is that virtually all the basic staples in Nigeria are being bioengineered and released for commercial cultivation.  This is unprecedented anywhere in the world.

“We have earlier expressed (in May 2017) our deep concerns on the use of GMOs as food in Nigeria. These largely have to do with the obvious issues of loss of food sovereignty and the established adverse health effects. The germlines for the GMOs being released are proprietary products, designed and developed by multinational monopolies with history of aggressive and ruthless commercial operations. It is clear that in course of time, we would need to revert to them, repeatedly, to address issues that would inevitably arise with the deployment of these novel “black-box” products.

“It appears insane that we should submit our precious God-given food sovereignty into the hands of such (or any other) entities in this manner.  As for adverse health effects following chronic ingestion of GMOs, these, including cancers, organ damage, allergic reactions, antibiotic resistance and reductions in nutritional content, are very well-established. In her ongoing tussle with the North America Free Trade Zone wherein she is seeking to stop further importation of GMO foods from the United States, Mexico has cited over 150 peer-reviewed research published in top journals, documenting the incontrovertible adverse health effects associated GMO foods.

“There are very good reasons to doubt the thoroughness of the approval processes for these products in Nigeria. For instance, the Germany-based Testbiotech e.V., Institute for Independent Impact Assessment of Biotechnology, published an extensive peer-reviewed Report, documenting the utter incredible shoddiness characterizing the Risk Assessment exercise used to greenlight GM cowpea (beans) in Nigeria.  This damning Report, to all intents and purposes, has been largely ignored by concerned authorities in Nigeria. Worse, even the basic legal and reasonable requirement that GMO food products be appropriately labelled (Section 23(2) h of the NBMA Act 2015)10 is flouted with outright impunity.

“We therefore hereby call on the relevant Nigerian authorities (specifically the Nigeria Biosafety Management Agency, NBMA, and the National Agency for Foods and Drugs Administration and Control, NAFDAC) to conduct (or commission) appropriate chronic toxicity testings that transparently ascertain the safety of GM food products before their deployment for public consumption in Nigeria. Also, these Agencies are enjoined to comply with the Nigerian laws, that require that such products, if eventually licensed, are appropriately labelled to give the public informed choice in what they feed into their bodies,” they said.

The organization has commended the announced incorporation of malaria vaccine into routine childhood immunization schedule, while harping on the need to reposition medical and health records for improved environment-health outcomes.

At the programme, Dr. Agnes Yemisi Asagbra spoke on the topic: “Transgenic Solutions (GMOs) in Food, Human Health and Environment in Nigeria: Safety Considerations,” calling on Nigerians to be cautious about what they consume.

Continue Reading

News

CAN Reacts As Abia Becomes Only State In Nigeria To Tax Churches On Signpost, Demands Immediate Reversal

Published

on

St. Francis Church Shooting

The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in Abia State has reacted to the newly imposed tax on church signposts in the state.

The association made its position known on Tuesday via a letter titled “Taxation of Church Signposts in Abia State”.

In the statement, signed by the State CAN chairman, Rev. Ojo Ojo Uduma, and the State CAN secretary, Rev. Dr. Francis E. Okere, CAN revealed that Abia State is the only state in the whole of Nigeria that is taxing churches on their signposts.

CAN described the move as a regrettable one especially as the state is known as a Christian state having earned the name God’s own state.

The body called for the immediate reversal of the policy by the government to save the state from having an anti-Church reputation.

The letter read: “We write to express our displeasure over the state government policy of compelling churches to be paying taxes on their signposts.

“As a Christian and God’s own state, it is regrettable that Abia State is the only state in the whole federation that is taxing churches on their signposts.

“We therefore passionately plead with your Excellency as a matter of urgency to carefully look into this matter and possibly rescind the policy to avoid compelling the body of Christ in the state from seeing the regime as anti-Church.

CAN proposed a roundtable discussion with the government to figure out the way forward on the issue.

“Furthermore, leaders of the Christian body in the state can be invited for a roundtable discussion on the way forward over this very little but delicate issue.

“While looking forward to your favourable response, accept our esteemed assurances of our unalloyed support and prayers,” the statement concluded.

Continue Reading

News

Wike Declares War on Begging in Abuja: FCT Beggars to Face Eviction by Monday

Published

on

Nyesom Wike

Beggars in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, may need to start looking for other means of survival as Minister Nyesom Wike has vowed to end street begging in the city.

The Minister decried the high influx of beggars in the FCT and the embarrassment it brings to the city.

The former Rivers State Governor spoke during the flag-off of the construction of an access road from Ring Road 1 by N16 to the Judges Quarters and internal roads within Judges Quarters in Katampe District on Tuesday, October 22.

Wike, who declared war against insecurity, noted that many beggars in Abuja are not genuine but criminals.

He urged Nigerians to take their relatives off the streets, as such behavior will no longer be tolerated from Monday.

He emphasized the government’s commitment to not just providing infrastructure in the FCT but also ensuring good security for residents and visitors.

He said, “In terms of security, let me say it clearly now. We have declared war. Abuja is returning to a city full of beggars. I mean, if you know you have a sister, or you have a brother who is a beggar on the roads, from next week, we will remove them. We will take them out of the city. It is embarrassing that the first thing people see when they come in are just beggars on the roads. Sometimes, they may not even be beggars. They may be criminals pretending to be beggars. We will not allow that.

“So, I am giving a public order; from now till Sunday is the grace period. From Monday, we will remove them. We want to have a city that we can truly call a city. It is very embarrassing. We are fighting insecurity, and people are carrying plates as if they are beggars; maybe they are informants.

“So please, understand that it is not only infrastructure we are providing. We want to give you good security so you can sleep well with both eyes closed.”

Wike also mentioned the role of the National Assembly in the fight against insecurity in Abuja.

According to him, swift passage of the budget will enable ministers to effectively do their jobs, which is the implementation of the budget.

“I know that some of you may not be happy. Sometimes, we don’t need to make you happy. What is important is that we must do our work. If you are not happy, there is nothing we can do. The security and well-being of the people are key. That is why I have told the National Assembly members that we will do everything required to ensure people know that the National Assembly is doing all it can to support. Their role is to pass the budget on time. Ours is to implement it. I know that by 2025, they will continue to give their full support, because I know they will always stand to approve our budget.”

Wike disclosed that the road project will be ready by May next year, adding that his administration will continue to impact other sectors and will include the Area Councils in the developments.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending