Connect with us

Investment

Concerns as Nigeria Fails to Attract Big Oil Investments

Published

on

oil field
  • Concerns as Nigeria Fails to Attract Big Oil Investments

While other African oil-producing countries are gearing up to attract investments, regulatory uncertainty in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry has continued to darken the outlook for big projects in the country.

Several planned deepwater projects in the country, with the potential to bring online almost 1.1 million barrels of new production daily over the next five or more years, have been repeatedly pushed back by the International Oil Companies.

Since February 2012, when the 125,000-bpd Usan deepwater field started production, no major oil field has come on stream in the country.

Total’s $16bn Egina deepwater oilfield project, whose Floating Production, Storage and Offloading vessel recently sailed away from a fabrication and integration yard in Lagos for installation on the field, is expected to add 200,000 bpd to Nigeria’s oil production.

Analysts at PwC, noted in a new report titled ‘Africa’s oil and gas review’, that the industry was still awaiting the passage of the Petroleum Industry Bill.

“The associated uncertainty has likely caused the deferment of Final Investments Decisions for a host of upstream and midstream projects,” they said.

The bill, which seeks to change the organisational structure and fiscal terms governing the industry, suffered setbacks in the 6th and 7th National Assembly.

To fast-track its passage into law, the current National Assembly decided to split the bill into four parts – the Petroleum Industry Governance Bill, Petroleum Industry Administration Bill, Petroleum Industry Fiscal Bill and Petroleum Host Community Bill.

After its passage by both the Senate and the House of Representatives, the PIGB was transmitted to the President for assent in July to enable it to become law but President Muhammadu Buhari declined to assent to the bill.

The Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, International Energy Services Limited, Dr Diran Fawibe, in a telephone interview with our correspondent on Wednesday, noted that the taking of the final investment decisions on the deepwater projects had been very slow.

Projects that have not been sanctioned are Shell’s Bonga South-West and Aparo (225,000bpd) and Bonga North (100,000bpd), ExxonMobil’s Bosi (140,000bpd), Satellite Field Development Phase 2 (80,000bpd) and Uge (110,000bpd), Eni’s Zabazaba-Etan (120,000bpd), and Chevron’s Nsiko (100,000bpd).

Fawibe, a former top executive in the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, said Bonga South-West and Zabazaba-Etan were estimated to cost more than $10bn each, adding, “When you have inflows of this magnitude into an industry of a country, of course, that is a big investment.”

He said, “When international oil companies or investors have reservations about the economic condition of a country, the tendency is to delay their decisions. But the government, realising this, would then have to find a way of convincing or wooing them to ensure that they make the decisions in good time. If the oil companies are given incentives to make investments, surely they will do that.”

He noted that a lot of countries had discovered oil, saying the amount of investment that used to come to Nigeria would now have to be shared.

“But our behaviour does not reflect an understanding of that; we behave as if we are the only country in the world. By the time we get to understand that there are other countries competing for the same funds, maybe we will be able to take actions,” Fawibe added.

Commenting on the PIB, he said, “Time is running out, although we still have six or seven months to the end of the tenure of this current administration. If they are determined to do it, they can. And that is the assurance they have been giving, but there is nothing on the ground that will show that indeed they are committed to it.”

Nigeria’s oil and condensate production showed recovery last year and is estimated to remain at the level of two million bpd in 2018, according to Rystad Energy, an oil and gas consulting services and business intelligence data firm.

It said in an October 29, 2018 report, “While Nigeria is not expected to ramp up production further in the future, sanctioned and unsanctioned projects waiting to be put on stream would be able to offset declining volumes from mature fields, keeping oil supply stable.”

“The timely development of these resources is seen as key for maintaining the country’s oil supply. Given the favourable economics of upcoming projects, the development is expected to take place as planned, provided that the political situation does not create disruptions.

“The development of the projects, expected to be sanctioned in the next five years, is further expected to contribute to the growth in the medium and long-term investments in the country.”

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Investment

Minister Accuses Past NCDMB Leadership of Squandering $500m on Unproductive Projects

Published

on

Nigeria investment

The Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Oil), Heineken Lokpobiri, has accused the former executives of the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) of mismanaging a whopping $500 million on projects deemed unproductive.

Speaking at a dinner hosted by The Petroleum Club in Lagos, Lokpobiri minced no words as he shed light on what he described as egregious financial mismanagement within the organization.

Lokpobiri, during the interactive session, alleged that substantial sums were squandered on ventures that yielded little to no tangible results.

Among the projects cited was the infamous Brass modular refinery in Bayelsa State, for which a staggering $35 million was purportedly disbursed without any discernible progress.

Similarly, Lokpobiri raised concerns about a $20 million investment in a fertiliser factory, questioning its whereabouts and efficacy.

The minister’s accusations didn’t end there. He underscored what he termed the imprudent disbursement of funds, highlighting instances where significant amounts were released in lump sums against professional advice.

Lokpobiri stressed the need for a comprehensive review of these investments, lamenting the magnitude of the financial losses incurred.

Furthermore, Lokpobiri pointed fingers at the mismanagement of loans totaling approximately $350 million, which were intended to support investors.

According to him, a staggering 90% of these loans ended up as non-performing, exacerbating the financial hemorrhage experienced by the NCDMB.

Addressing the crisis between himself and the incumbent NCDMB boss, Felix Ogbe, Lokpobiri clarified that his intervention was grounded in the oversight responsibilities vested in him as the chairman of the council overseeing the NCDMB.

He stated the importance of due diligence in governance and reiterated his commitment to ensuring transparency and accountability within the organization.

In response to Lokpobiri’s accusations, the immediate past Executive Secretary of the NCDMB, Simbi Wabote, vehemently refuted the allegations, asserting that they lacked substantiation.

Wabote defended the integrity of the Nigerian Content Intervention Fund, hailing it as a pivotal initiative with an impressive 96% payback rate.

Wabote also defended the NCDMB’s investment decisions, citing instances of successful ventures such as the equity investment in Waltersmith’s modular refinery, which has shown promising returns.

He attributed challenges faced by certain projects to external factors and legal disputes, maintaining the organization’s commitment to prudent financial management.

As the allegations continue to reverberate across the industry, stakeholders await the outcome of the government’s review, which could potentially reshape the trajectory of the NCDMB and its approach to investment and governance.

Continue Reading

Investment

SEC Brings N2.36tn in Funds Under Custody with New Guidelines

Published

on

security and exchange commission

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has successfully brought about N2.36 trillion in discretionary and non-discretionary funds under custody.

This achievement follows the implementation of updated guidelines for Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) in Nigeria.

Last December, the SEC proposed amendments to address grievances within the Collective Investment Scheme segment of the capital market.

These amendments sought to enhance investor safeguards and address concerns raised by market participants.

In a notice published on its website titled ‘Exposure Of New And Sundry Amendments To The Rules And Regulations Of The Commission,’ the SEC outlined the new regulatory changes.

Among these changes was the requirement for all CIS funds, including those in discretionary and non-discretionary windows, to be placed under custody.

This move was aimed at strengthening investor protection and mitigating risks associated with fund management.

Dr. Okey Umeano, the Chief Economist at SEC, provided insights into the impact of these regulatory updates during a media briefing after the first-quarter Capital Market Committee meeting.

He highlighted that prior to the regulatory amendments, only funds designated as Collective Investment Schemes were subject to custody.

However, with the new guidelines in place, all funds, regardless of their discretionary or non-discretionary nature, are now required to be custodied.

Umeano revealed that the SEC conducted inspections to ensure compliance with the new regulations, resulting in N2.36 trillion of discretionary and non-discretionary funds being brought under custody.

This move underscores the SEC’s commitment to safeguarding investor interests and fostering trust in the capital market ecosystem.

Former SEC Director-General, Lamido Yuguda, emphasized the importance of segregating asset management and custody functions to mitigate risks.

He noted that while the separation of these functions was standard practice for public CIS products, it was not uniformly applied to bilateral arrangements.

However, with the implementation of the new rules, all investment management activities, whether in public CIS or bilateral spaces, are mandated to be in custody.

Yuguda stressed that the objective of these regulatory changes is to improve trust, protect investors’ assets, and bolster market confidence.

By ensuring that investment management activities are segregated, with custody handled by duly licensed custodians, the SEC aims to create a more resilient and transparent capital market environment.

Continue Reading

Investment

Lagos State Government Set to Demolish $200 Million Landmark Beach Resort

Published

on

Landmark Beach

The Lagos State Government has issued a demolition warning to the proprietor of the $200 million Landmark Beach Resort, a renowned tourist destination in the region.

The resort nestled along the picturesque coastline faces imminent destruction to make way for the construction of a 700-kilometer coastal road linking Lagos with Calabar.

Paul Onwuanibe, the 58-year-old owner of the Landmark Beach Resort, revealed that he received a notice in late March instructing him to vacate the premises within seven days to facilitate the impending demolition.

The resort, which spans a vast expanse of land and hosts over 80 businesses, is a hub of economic activity, sustaining over 4,000 jobs directly. Also, it contributes more than N2 billion in taxes annually.

The news of the resort’s potential demolition has sparked concerns among investors and stakeholders in the tourism sector. Onwuanibe expressed dismay at the government’s decision, highlighting the substantial investments made in developing the resort’s infrastructure.

He explained that the planned demolition would not only lead to significant financial losses but also jeopardize the livelihoods of thousands of employees and businesses associated with the resort.

The Landmark Beach Resort is a popular tourist destination, attracting approximately one million visitors annually, both local and international. Its unique amenities, including a mini-golf course, beach soccer field, and volleyball and basketball courts, make it a favorite among tourists seeking leisure and recreation.

The prospect of the resort’s demolition has triggered widespread panic among international and domestic investors associated with the Landmark Group. Many are now considering withdrawing their investments, citing concerns about the viability of the business without its flagship beach resort.

The Lagos State Government’s decision to proceed with the demolition is part of its broader plan to construct the Lagos-Calabar coastal highway, a 700-kilometer roadway connecting Lagos to Calabar.

The government had earlier announced its intention to remove all “illegal” constructions along the planned route of the highway, including the Landmark Beach Resort.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending