Connect with us

Markets

Experts, Group Express Concern Over 2017 Budget Proposal

Published

on

Budget 2017 year on cube with pencil and clock
  • Experts, Group Express Concern Over 2017 Budget Proposal

The Centre for Social Justice on Thursday faulted the framework to be used to raise the proposed N4.9tn revenue to fund the 2017 budget of the Federal Government.

The group, in a preliminary analysis of the budget proposals submitted to the National Assembly by President Muhammadu Buhari on Wednesday, expressed concern that the revenue target was rather optimistic.

Based on the revenue projections for 2017, a total sum of N1.98tn is being expected from oil sources, while non-oil sources are expected to contribute N1.37tn.

Independent revenues of N807.57bn are also being expected from agencies of government, while N565.1bn and N210.9bn are expected from recovered loot and other revenue sources.

The Lead Director, CSJ, Mr. Eze Onyekpere, in an electronic mail sent to our correspondent, said the inability of the Federal Government to resolve the challenges in the Niger Delta might affect the proposed N1.98tn revenue from oil.

He said, “The first challenge of the revenue framework is on the expected revenue from oil. The lack of a clear path for the resolution of the insurgency in the Niger Delta region will affect the realisation of the projection for oil revenue.

“The President indicated that disruptions to crude oil production partly contributed to significant shortfalls in projected revenues. If the country could not meet the 2016 projection, and without resolving the challenge, it is likely that the 2017 projection will not be met.”

Also speaking on the budget parameters, the Chief Consultant, B. Adedipe Associates, Dr. Biodun Adedipe, said that the budget was a good step in the right direction in reflating the economy.

He said, “This year’s budget is in a good direction in terms of volume, structure and in terms of emphasis. The important thing now is to encourage the government to continue in that direction.

“The sectors to focus on are good, and we should put more emphasis on capital expenditure rather than recurrent expenditure. There is also a need for credit, because you can’t grow a modern economic system without credit; and when credit is expensive, you can’t get the loan that you want to borrow.”

The Head, Investment Advisory, SCM Limited, a research and investment advisory firm, Mr. Sewa Wusu, said the budget would only set the country on the part of economic recovery if it was well implemented to the extent that the government would mobilise the needed financial resources and spend same in critical sectors that would enhance economic recovery.

He, however, stressed that the proposed budget would not take the country out of recession, contrary to the government’s opinion.

The Chief Executive Officer, Advanced Varieties, a research and investment firm, Mr. Kola Akinlade, said apart from the fact that the government got it wrong in terms of the budget assumptions like the exchange rate, oil output, total expenditure and debt servicing figure, there was also an issue with the manner it was planning to raise funds.

He noted that the government might not be able to achieve the target it set with the budget.

The Chief Executive Officer, Cowry Asset Management Limited, Mr. Johnson Chukwu, expressed concerns over the Federal Government’s intention to borrow N1.254tn from the domestic market to finance the budget deficit of N2.36tn.

Chukwu said the decision would have significant impact on the ability of private investors to get funding from the banks and other lenders.

He stated that the government had said it would restructure the national debt so that 60 per cent would be foreign, and the balance would be local.

A professor of Economics at the Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago Iwoye, Sherriffdeen Tella, expressed doubt that the government would be able to raise up to the N7.3tn it planned to spend in the budget.

He noted that the government was still battling with how to raise funds to implement the 2016 budget.

Similarly, the Senior Associate, Investment Banking, Afrinvest, Mr. Ayodeji Ebo, said it would be very difficult or nearly impossible for the Federal Government to achieve the targets it set in the 2017 budget proposal.

According to him, the government has yet to achieve 50 per cent performance for the 2016 budget due to sundry problems relating to funding and economic policies.

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Crude Oil

Brent Plunges Below $83 Amidst Rising US Stockpiles and Middle East Uncertainty

Published

on

Brent crude oil - Investors King

The global oil declined today as Brent crude prices plummeted below $83 per barrel, its lowest level since mid-March.

This steep decline comes amidst a confluence of factors, including a worrisome surge in US oil inventories and escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

On the commodity exchanges, Brent crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, experienced a sharp decline, dipping below the psychologically crucial threshold of $83 per barrel.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, the US benchmark, also saw a notable decrease to $77 per barrel.

The downward spiral in oil prices has been attributed to a plethora of factors rattling the market’s stability.

One of the primary drivers behind the recent slump in oil prices is the mounting stockpiles of crude oil in the United States.

According to industry estimates, crude inventories at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for WTI futures contracts, surged by over 1 million barrels last week.

Also, reports indicate a significant buildup in nationwide holdings of gasoline and distillates, further exacerbating concerns about oversupply in the market.

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East continue to add a layer of uncertainty to the oil market dynamics.

The Israeli military’s incursion into the Gazan city of Rafah has intensified concerns about the potential escalation of conflicts in the region.

Despite efforts to broker a truce between Israel and Hamas, designated as a terrorist organization by both the US and the European Union, a lasting peace agreement remains elusive, fostering an environment of instability that reverberates across global energy markets.

Analysts and investors alike are closely monitoring these developments, with many expressing apprehension about the implications for oil prices in the near term.

The recent downturn in oil prices reflects a broader trend of market pessimism, with indicators such as timespreads and processing margins signaling a weakening outlook for the commodity.

The narrowing of Brent and WTI’s prompt spreads to multi-month lows suggests that market conditions are becoming increasingly less favorable for oil producers.

Furthermore, the strengthening of the US dollar is compounding the challenges facing the oil market, as a stronger dollar renders commodities more expensive for investors using other currencies.

The dollar’s upward trajectory, coupled with oil’s breach below its 100-day moving average, has intensified selling pressure on crude futures, exacerbating the latest bout of price weakness.

In the face of these headwinds, some market observers remain cautiously optimistic, citing ongoing supply-side risks as a potential source of support for oil prices.

Factors such as the upcoming June meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) and the prospect of renewed curbs on Iranian and Venezuelan oil production could potentially mitigate downward pressure on prices in the coming months.

However, uncertainties surrounding the trajectory of global oil demand, geopolitical developments, and the efficacy of OPEC+ supply policies continue to cast a shadow of uncertainty over the oil market outlook.

As traders await official data on crude inventories and monitor geopolitical developments in the Middle East, the coming days are likely to be marked by heightened volatility and uncertainty in the oil markets.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Climb on Renewed Middle East Concerns and Saudi Supply Signals

Published

on

Crude oil

As global markets continue to navigate through geopolitical uncertainties, oil prices rose on Monday on renewed concerns in the Middle East and signals from Saudi Arabia regarding its crude supply.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigeria’s oil is priced, surged by 51 cents to $83.47 a barrel while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil rose by 53 cents to $78.64 a barrel.

The recent escalation in tensions between Israel and Hamas has amplified fears of a widening conflict in the key oil-producing region, prompting investors to closely monitor developments.

Talks for a ceasefire in Gaza have been underway, but prospects for a deal appeared slim as Hamas reiterated its demand for an end to the war in exchange for the release of hostages, a demand rejected by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The uncertainty surrounding the conflict was further exacerbated on Monday when Israel’s military called on Palestinian civilians to evacuate Rafah as part of a ‘limited scope’ operation, sparking concerns of a potential ground assault.

Analysts warned that such developments risk derailing ceasefire negotiations and reigniting geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

Adding to the bullish sentiment, Saudi Arabia announced an increase in the official selling prices (OSPs) for its crude sold to Asia, Northwest Europe, and the Mediterranean in June.

This move signaled the kingdom’s anticipation of strong demand during the summer months and contributed to the upward pressure on oil prices.

The uptick in prices comes after both Brent and WTI crude futures posted their steepest weekly losses in three months last week, reflecting concerns over weak U.S. jobs data and the timing of a potential Federal Reserve interest rate cut.

However, with most of the long positions in oil cleared last week, analysts suggest that the risks are skewed towards a rebound in prices in the early part of this week, particularly for WTI prices towards the $80 mark.

Meanwhile, in China, the world’s largest crude importer, services activity remained in expansionary territory for the 16th consecutive month, signaling a sustained economic recovery.

Also, U.S. energy companies reduced the number of oil and natural gas rigs operating for the second consecutive week, indicating a potential tightening of supply in the near term.

As global markets continue to navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and supply dynamics, investors remain vigilant, closely monitoring developments in the Middle East and their impact on oil prices.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Drop Sharply, Marking Steepest Weekly Decline in Three Months

Published

on

Crude Oil - Investors King

Amidst concerns over weak U.S. jobs data and the potential timing of a Federal Reserve interest rate cut, oil prices record its sharpest weekly decline in three months.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigerian oil is priced, settled 71 cents lower to close at $82.96 a barrel.

Similarly, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil fell 84 cents, or 1.06% to end the week at $78.11 a barrel.

The primary driver behind this decline was investor apprehension regarding the impact of sustained borrowing costs on the U.S. economy, the world’s foremost oil consumer. These concerns were amplified after the Federal Reserve opted to maintain interest rates at their current levels this week.

Throughout the week, Brent experienced a decline of over 7%, while WTI dropped by 6.8%.

The slowdown in U.S. job growth, revealed in April’s data, coupled with a cooling annual wage gain, intensified expectations among traders for a potential interest rate cut by the U.S. central bank.

Tim Snyder, an economist at Matador Economics, noted that while the economy is experiencing a slight deceleration, the data presents a pathway for the Fed to enact at least one rate cut this year.

The Fed’s decision to keep rates unchanged this week, despite acknowledging elevated inflation levels, has prompted a reassessment of the anticipated timing for potential rate cuts, according to Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS.

Higher interest rates typically exert downward pressure on economic activity and can dampen oil demand.

Also, U.S. energy companies reduced the number of oil and natural gas rigs for the second consecutive week, reaching the lowest count since January 2022, as reported by Baker Hughes.

The oil and gas rig count fell by eight to 605, with the number of oil rigs dropping by seven to 499, the most significant weekly decline since November 2023.

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict have somewhat eased as discussions for a temporary ceasefire progress with international mediators.

Looking ahead, the next meeting of OPEC+ oil producers is scheduled for June 1, where the group may consider extending voluntary oil output cuts beyond June if global oil demand fails to pick up.

In light of these developments, money managers reduced their net long U.S. crude futures and options positions in the week leading up to April 30, according to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending