Connect with us

Technology

Africa Defeats World’s Biggest Mobile Carriers

Published

on

Telecommunications - Investors King
  • Africa Defeats World’s Biggest Mobile Carriers

Back when African countries were auctioning off mobile licenses by the boatload to serve the region’s young, tech-savvy population, investing in the continent’s fast-growing economies seemed like a no-brainer. Some of the world’s biggest wireless carriers rushed in.

Now they’re wondering if they made a mistake. Increasing government and regulatory scrutiny, as well as a lack of expansion opportunities in sub-Saharan Africa, are making it harder for operators such as Vodafone Group Plc, Orange SA and Bharti Airtel Ltd. to grow. Their choice: Pull back or double down.

Two companies beating at least a partial retreat are Millicom International Cellular SA, which disposed of its Senegal and Democratic Republic of Congo units, and India’s Airtel, which sold businesses in Burkina Faso and Sierra Leone to Orange earlier this year. Reducing its exposure to Kenya, Vodafone transferred most of its $3.6 billion stake in Nairobi-based Safaricom Ltd. to majority-owned South African unit Vodacom Group Ltd. in May, and may pare further. That leaves Vodafone Ghana as the U.K. company’s sole own-branded African operation.

“At this point it is becoming clear who has a chance of making it in Africa and who does not, and it essentially boils down to scale, as well as government sway,” said Baha Makarem, an analyst at Arqaam Capital. “It’s just a question of who is ready to weather the storm.”

The shift in sentiment comes as governments across sub-Saharan Africa are losing favor with investors. The fall in commodity prices has reduced tax revenue in many countries, and average economic growth slumped to 1.4 percent last year from 3.4 percent in 2015, according to the International Monetary Fund. That’s encouraged lawmakers in countries including Tanzania and Ghana to look to international companies for revenue opportunities—both have ordered foreign wireless carriers to cede shares to local investors.

“The regulatory challenges are top of our mind at all times,” MTN Group Ltd. Chairman Phuthuma Nhleko told shareholders at the annual meeting of Africa’s biggest wireless carrier on May 25. “It’s just part of the environment in which we operate.”

Nhleko has firsthand experience with that. A Nigerian watchdog fined the carrier $5.2 billion in 2015 for missing a deadline to disconnect unregistered subscribers, leading to a slump in the share price that’s yet to turn around. The penalty was reduced to $1 billion after months of negotiations and Nhleko has since overhauled management and corporate governance. Even so, MTN was fined $8.5 million in Rwanda in May for non-compliance with its license obligations. The company hasn’t yet delivered on a promise to list its Nigerian unit in Lagos.

Vodacom, 70 percent owned by Vodafone, has complied with Tanzania’s demand to sell shares on the Dar es Salaam stock exchange. It had to delay the listing when a surge in demand from retail investors slowed the processing of applications from outside the country.

IPOs are the only way to force the wireless carriers to share their profits with local investors in the East African country, Tanzanian President John Magufuli said last month, adding that licenses could be withdrawn if they refuse the order.

“It is not enough to just subject the mobile-phone companies to fines and allow them to continue minting billions of money in profits,” the local Daily News quoted him as saying.

Not everyone is down on Africa, where GSMA Intelligence expects mobile revenue will reach $43 billion in 2020. Orange, France’s market leader, in February called Africa a priority region and has focused most of its investment in French-speaking markets such as Cameroon and Ivory Coast.
That’s partly to offset stagnating growth in Europe and to take advantage of a younger population demanding faster and cheaper data, according to Bruno Mettling, the Paris-based company’s head of operations on the continent. A lack of obsolete infrastructure that would need to be removed or upgraded is also underlying the business case, he said.

Some operators “are withdrawing from Africa in the face of the enormous investments to be made—3G, 4G, but also in the fiber to connect the antennas to each other,” Mettling said. “At Orange, we invest an average of 1 billion euros ($1.1 billion) in Africa each year.”

Areas of expansion for Orange include mobile banking, where Nairobi-based Safaricom blazed a trail with its M-Pesa product in Kenya. Orange Money reported a 74 percent increase in customers, to more than 30 million, in the first quarter, and plans to extend the service into its home market this year. Orange’s francophone markets have so far stopped short of ordering share sales to local investors.

Vodacom, based in Johannesburg, is another considering further expansion following the Safaricom deal. The tougher market and increasing willingness of some rivals to sell may have brought down prices, Chief Executive Officer Shameel Joosub said at the company’s results presentation in May.

“The days of you going in with a new greenfield license are gone,” Joosub said. The price of potential acquisition targets is, however, “becoming more reasonable,” and there “are not that many buyers.”

The first wave of second-generation digital mobile licenses in Africa started in the late 1990s, with Nigeria being one of the last countries to issue its first permit in 2001. While those markets have since been growing—more than half the continent’s population is seen owning a smartphone by 2020—the only country yet to auction licenses is Ethiopia.

“Africa is a market of growth, but also a very difficult environment to operate,” said Dobek Pater, managing director of Pretoria-based Africa Analysis. “Costs of operation are often high, disposable income levels of large segments of the society low, and the regulatory environment not always predictable. Only companies with “increasing economies of scale will succeed.”

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Startups

Madica Empowers African Startups with $200,000 Investments Each

Published

on

Start-up - Investors King

Madica, a structured investment program dedicated to nurturing pre-seed stage startups in Africa, has announced its inaugural investments in three innovative ventures.

Each of these startups is set to receive up to $200,000 in funding from Madica and will participate in the program’s comprehensive 18-month company-building support initiative.

The investment program provides a personalized curriculum, hands-on mentorship, founder immersion trips, executive coaching, and access to Madica’s extensive global network of investors for follow-on funding.

The primary objective of this support is to drive growth and ensure the long-term success of the startups.

Emmanuel Adegboye, Head of Madica, expressed his excitement regarding the investments, highlighting the abundant talent and innovation present in the African tech ecosystem.

He said Madica is committed to supporting African founders who often face challenges in accessing necessary support due to perceptions of risk among global investors.

Madica employs an open application process, collaborating closely with local ecosystem players such as incubators, accelerators, and angel networks to identify and support promising entrepreneurs.

The selection process remains rigorous, with investments made on a rolling basis throughout the year.

With plans to invest in up to 10 additional startups this year, Madica aims to expand the reach of venture capital and founder mentorship across Africa, addressing the existing imbalances in funding availability.

The announcement of these investments marks a significant milestone for the selected startups, providing them with vital financial support as well as access to invaluable resources and networks to propel their growth and success in the competitive landscape of the African startup ecosystem.

Continue Reading

Social Media

Meta’s Revenue Woes Shake Tech Industry Confidence

Published

on

Facebook Meta

The tech industry faced a wave of uncertainty as Meta Platforms Inc., formerly known as Facebook, delivered a disappointing earnings report that sent shockwaves through the market and dented investor confidence.

Meta’s forecast of weaker-than-expected sales for the current quarter, coupled with plans for higher capital expenditures, rattled investors who were eagerly anticipating robust results.

Shares of Meta plummeted by as much as 19% in after-hours trading to trigger a cascade effect across the tech sector.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index experienced a decline of up to 1%, reflecting broader concerns about the health of the industry.

Analysts and investors alike expressed dismay at Meta’s inability to meet revenue expectations, citing uncertainties surrounding the company’s adoption and monetization of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.

Jack Ablin, Chief Investment Officer at Cresset Wealth Advisors, highlighted the disappointment on the revenue front, overshadowing any optimism about AI adoption.

Questions lingered regarding the efficacy of AI investments and their potential benefits to users, leading to increased skepticism among stakeholders.

The repercussions of Meta’s earnings miss extended beyond its own stock, impacting other tech giants slated to report earnings in the coming days.

Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com Inc., and social media companies like Snap Inc. and Pinterest Inc. all witnessed notable declines, signaling a broader sentiment shift within the industry.

The fallout from Meta’s revenue woes reverberated across the tech landscape, affecting chipmakers, server manufacturers, and software firms. Nvidia Corp., Micron Technology Inc., and International Business Machines Corp. were among the companies affected, as investor concerns over AI investment and revenue growth cast a shadow over the sector’s outlook.

As the tech industry grapples with Meta’s disappointing results, stakeholders are left to ponder the implications for future investments and strategic decisions.

The episode serves as a stark reminder of the inherent volatility and uncertainty within the tech sector, underscoring the importance of diligent risk management and strategic foresight in navigating turbulent markets.

Continue Reading

Social Media

TikTok Vows Legal Battle Amid Threat of US Ban

Published

on

TikTok 1

As the specter of a US ban looms large over TikTok, the popular social media platform has declared its intention to wage a legal battle against potential legislation that could force its Chinese-owned parent company, ByteDance Ltd., to divest its ownership stake in the app.

In what amounts to a fight for its very existence in one of its most crucial markets, TikTok is gearing up for a high-stakes showdown in the courts.

The alarm bells were sounded within TikTok’s ranks as Michael Beckerman, the company’s head of public policy for the Americas, issued a rallying cry to its US staff.

In a memo obtained by Bloomberg News, Beckerman characterized the proposed legislation as an “unprecedented deal” brokered between Republican Speaker and President Biden, signaling TikTok’s readiness to challenge it legally once signed into law.

“This is an unprecedented deal worked out between the Republican Speaker and President Biden,” Beckerman stated in the memo. “At the stage that the bill is signed, we will move to the courts for a legal challenge.”

The urgency of TikTok’s response stems from recent developments in the US Congress, where lawmakers have fast-tracked legislation mandating ByteDance’s divestment from TikTok.

The bill, intricately linked to a vital aid package for Ukraine and Israel, has garnered significant bipartisan support and is expected to swiftly pass through the Senate before landing on President Biden’s desk.

Beckerman minced no words in his critique of the proposed legislation, labeling it a “clear violation” of TikTok users’ First Amendment rights and warning of “devastating consequences” for the millions of small businesses that rely on the platform for their livelihoods.

TikTok’s defiant stance reflects the gravity of the situation facing the tech giant, which has spent years grappling with concerns from US officials regarding potential national security risks associated with its Chinese ownership.

Despite extensive lobbying efforts led by TikTok CEO Shou Chew to allay these fears, the company now finds itself at a critical juncture, where legal action appears to be its last line of defense.

ByteDance, TikTok’s Beijing-based parent company, has also signaled its intent to challenge any US ban in court, signaling a united front in the face of mounting pressure.

However, navigating the legal landscape will not be without its challenges, as ByteDance must contend with both US legislative measures and potential obstacles posed by the Chinese government, which has reiterated its opposition to a forced sale of TikTok.

As TikTok prepares to embark on what promises to be a protracted legal battle, the outcome remains uncertain.

For the millions of users and businesses that call TikTok home, the stakes have never been higher, as the platform fights to preserve its presence in the fiercely competitive landscape of social media.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending