Connect with us

Business

Analysis of Premier League’s Summer Transfer Dealings

Published

on

premier league - Investors King
  • Analysis of Premier League’s Summer Transfer Dealings

The Premier League’s broadcast and TV rights ensured the spending powers of its clubs over the course of the summer were fully felt and a lot of business was done in what was a very active transfer window.

The Premier League donned out an astonishing £1.4 billion in player recruitment as 115 players settled into new Premier League surroundings.

The pick of the bunch was Harry Maguire, as Manchester United’s search for a commanding presence at the back led to them splashing out an incredible £80m on the England international. Arsenal surprised fans and created a new buzz of optimism among them with the acquisition of Nicolas Pepe, Lille pocketing a grand £72m for a player involved in over 30 goals last season.

Tottenham infamously failed to sign a single player in the last two transfer windows but were not messing around this time, Daniel Levy and co-sanctioning the purchase of £63m midfield powerhouse Tanguy Ndombele from French side Lyon while Pep Guardiola and Manchester City’s lust for continental success required the extra acquisitions of midfield lynchpin Rodri from Atletico Madrid for £62.5m and the procurement of right back Cancelo for £60m from Italian giants Juventus rounding off the most expensive deals of the summer transfer window.

In total amount of money spent, Manchester United once again top the lot, their bid to return to England’s top table leading to the splurge of a grand total £148m on Harry Maguire, left back Aaron Wan-Bissaka (£50m from Crystal Palace) and Welsh winger Daniel James (£18m from Swansea). Premier league new boys Aston Vila spent the next most, acquiring 12 players for a total outlay of £144.5m in a titanic bid to stay afloat in the Premier League.

Four other clubs surpassed the £100m mark. Arsenal must consider themselves good enough to challenge for top honors this season after spending a grand total £138m on Pepe, £27m on William Saliba, (who they signed and loaned back to Saint Etienne for a season), Gabriel Martinelli for £6m, Dani Ceballos who they acquired on loan from Real Madrid and deadline day arrivals David Luiz (£8m) and Kieran Tierny (£25m) acquired from Chelsea and Celtic respectively.

Up next, Manchester City. As expected, the Citizen bolstered their squad once again after falling short in the Champions league quarter finals by spending £134.8m on Rodri, Joao Cancelo, as well as the signing of Zackary Steffen for £7m and exercising their buy back clause in signing Angelino from PSV for a meagre £5.3m.

Expectations and pressure must be high at Goddison Park this season after Everton splashed a stupendous £118.5m on Moise Kean (27.5m), Jean-Phillipe Gbamin (£25m), Fabian Delph (£9m), acquiring Andre Gomes in a permanent deal from Barca for £22m and deadline day deal of Alex Iwobi for a reported £35m.

Tottenham compensated for a two window no-show by utilizing just over £100m in the dealings for Ndombele, Jack Clarke (£8.5m) and deadline day signing of Ryan Sessegnon from Fulham for £30m and loan signing of Argentine midfielder, Giovanni Lo Celso from Real Betis.

Spending of other clubs in descending order are Leicester (£91m), West Ham (£78m), Newcastle and Wolves both spent £65m each, Brighton (£58.5m), Southampton (£50m), Bournemouth (£45.7m), Watford (£45.5m), Sheffield United (£43m). Chelsea’s transfer ban meant thy could only spend £40m in turning Mateo Kovacic’s loan into a permanent move. Burnley and Crystal Palace are behind them, having spent £15m and £11m respectively.

Liverpool’s decision to bolster their Champions league winning squad with just a total £4.4m outlay would surely be tested as the season progresses while Norwich prop up the table having spent next to nothing, the Canaries having total faith in the side that won the Championship and got them into the big time, with just £1.1m spent.

In terms of outgoings, the Premier League recouped £806.5m from player sales with 291 players sold against £359m cash influx gotten in 2018.

Chelsea top the list of gainers, Eden Hazard’s sale to Real Madrid bringing in £130m and Alvaro Morata’s loan was made permanent by Atletico for £58.3m.

Leicester are next, receiving £80m from Manchester United in a world-record fee for a defender for Harry Maguire’s move, United themselves recouping £74m from player sales. Others include Everton (£60m), Manchester City (£58.1m), Arsenal (£55.5m), Crystal Palace (£50m), Bournemouth (£36.5m), West Ham (£33.25m), Newcastle (£31.7m), Tottenham (£29.7m), Liverpool (£28.82m), Southampton (£26m), Watford (£18.2m), Burnley (£8.5m) and Wolves receiving £3m in player fees.

Dan Jones, a partner Sports Business Group at Deloitte feels that with this level of net spend and the Premier League broadcast right values, wages would increase at a greater rate than revenue, returning a wages to revenue ratio of over 60%.

He said “But this does not signal major financial concerns because Premier League clubs collectively generated pre-tax profits of £426m in 2017-18, while net spend as a proportion of revenue of 12% is at its lowest since 2012.”

Deloitte has, however, predicted that La Liga clubs could still overtake the total money spent by the Premier League as their total spending currently sits at £1.1bn with Real Madrid, Barcelona and Atletico Madrid responsible for as much as two thirds of that figure alone. With the Spanish transfer window not closing until September 2 and Barca’s persistent interest and pursuit of Neymar, they could be well on their way to shattering that record figure.

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Business

Computer Village Traders Demand Refunds as Lagos State Cancels Katangowa Project

Published

on

Traders at the renowned Computer Village in Lagos find themselves in a state of uncertainty following the abrupt termination of the multibillion-naira Katangowa project by the Lagos State Government.

The project, which was aimed at relocating the bustling tech market from its current site in Ikeja to the Agbado/Oke-Odo area of the state, has left traders in a state of limbo.

Despite the cancellation of the project reportedly occurring two years ago, traders claim they were not informed by either the government or the developers, Bridgeways Limited.

This lack of communication has left them in a precarious position, particularly concerning the substantial upfront payments made by some traders to the developers.

Chairman of the Computer Village Market Board, Chief Adebowale Soyebo, expressed dismay at the lack of communication from the authorities regarding the project’s termination.

He explained that neither the government nor the contractors had officially informed them of the decision, leaving traders in the dark about the fate of their investments.

Traders who had made payments to Bridgeways Limited now seek clarity on the refund process. The absence of official communication has compounded their concerns, with many uncertain about the fate of their investments.

While acknowledging the payments made by traders, Lagos State Governor’s Adviser on e-GIS and Urban Development, Dr. Olajide Babatunde, assured that the government would facilitate refunds.

He, however, said there is a need for proper identification and verification to ensure that affected traders receive their refunds accordingly.

The termination of the Katangowa project has reignited debates about the relocation of Computer Village.

Traders assert that the issue of relocation should not be raised until the new site is at least 70% completed, as per their agreement with the government.

The cancellation of the Katangowa project underscores the challenges associated with large-scale urban development projects and the importance of transparent communication between stakeholders to avoid such situations in the future.

As traders await further directives from the government, they remain hopeful for a resolution that safeguards their interests and ensures the continuity of one of Nigeria’s most prominent tech markets.

Continue Reading

Business

Government Begins Disbursement of N200bn Support Fund to Manufacturers and Businesses

Published

on

business solution - Investors King

The Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment has initiated the disbursement of the long-awaited N200 billion Presidential Conditional Grant Scheme.

This is the beginning of a vital phase in the government’s strategy to provide financial assistance to manufacturers and businesses across Nigeria.

The scheme, which is being administered through the Bank of Industry (BOI), has been divided into three categories of funding, totaling N200 billion.

The disbursement process comes after an exhaustive selection process and verification of applicants to ensure transparency and accountability in the allocation of funds.

Doris Aniete, spokesperson for the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment, announced the progress in a statement posted on the trade minister’s official X (formerly Twitter) handle.

Aniete highlighted that verified beneficiaries have already started receiving their grants, signaling the beginning of the phased disbursement strategy.

“We are pleased to inform you that the disbursement process for the Presidential Conditional Grant Programme has officially commenced. Some beneficiaries have already received their grants, marking the beginning of our phased disbursement strategy,” stated Aniete.

She further disclosed that by Friday, April 19, a substantial number of verified applicants are set to receive significant disbursements.

However, Aniete emphasized that disbursements are ongoing, and not all applicants will receive their grants immediately, assuring that all verified applicants will eventually receive their grants in subsequent phases.

The initiation of the disbursement process comes after more than eight months since President Bola Tinubu announced the grant for manufacturers and small businesses.

The scheme aims to mitigate the adverse effects of recent economic reforms and foster sustainable economic growth by empowering businesses with financial support.

President Tinubu had outlined the government’s commitment to strengthening the manufacturing sector and creating job opportunities through the disbursement of N200 billion over a specified period.

The funding is intended to provide credit to 75 enterprises, each able to access up to N1 billion at a low-interest rate of 9% per annum.

However, the implementation of the programme has faced challenges, including delays and criticisms regarding the registration process.

Femi Egbesola, President of the Association of Small Business Owners, expressed concerns over the slow pace of data collation and suggested that genuine businesses were being discouraged from accessing the loans.

Despite the hurdles, the commencement of the disbursement process signifies a significant step forward in the government’s efforts to provide vital support to manufacturers and businesses, potentially revitalizing economic activities and driving growth across various sectors.

As beneficiaries begin to receive their grants, the impact of this initiative on the nation’s economic landscape is eagerly anticipated.

Continue Reading

Company News

MicroStrategy Rally Crushes Short Sellers, Wiping Out $1.92 Billion

Published

on

MicroStrategy- Investors King

Short sellers betting against MicroStrategy found themselves facing significant losses as the company’s rally wiped out $1.92 billion since March.

This development comes amidst a rally that has seen MicroStrategy’s stock outperform bitcoin, causing a considerable hit to those who had taken a bearish stance on the tech firm.

According to data from S3 Partners, short sellers have been on the losing end since March, as MicroStrategy’s stock surged, highlighting the impact of the rally on those betting against the company’s success.

This loss underscores the challenges faced by short sellers in a market where certain stocks experience rapid and unexpected price increases.

The rally in MicroStrategy’s stock is attributed to several factors, including the approval of several spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) earlier in the year.

This move by the SEC brought bitcoin, a once-nascent asset class, closer to the mainstream and fueled investor interest in companies like MicroStrategy, known for their significant holdings of the cryptocurrency.

MicroStrategy, which held nearly 190,000 bitcoin on its balance sheet as of the end of 2023, has indicated its intention to continue increasing its exposure to the digital currency.

The company’s decision to sell convertible debt to raise money for additional bitcoin purchases further bolstered investor confidence and contributed to the stock’s rally.

Analysts at BTIG noted that the premium for MicroStrategy’s stock reflects investors’ desire to gain exposure to bitcoin indirectly, especially those who may not have the means to invest directly in the cryptocurrency or ETFs.

The company’s ability to raise capital for bitcoin purchases is seen as a positive sign for shareholders, adding to the optimism surrounding its stock.

However, despite the recent rally and optimism surrounding MicroStrategy, the crypto industry as a whole continues to be heavily shorted.

Short interest in nine of the most-watched companies in the crypto space remains high, standing at 16.73% of the total number of outstanding shares, more than three times the average in the United States.

Moreover, concerns persist regarding the SEC’s stance on cryptocurrencies, with some experts suggesting that the approval of spot bitcoin ETFs may not necessarily indicate a broader acceptance of other similar products, such as spot ethereum ETFs.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending