Connect with us

Markets

Nigeria Losing Revenue to IOCs Over Delayed PSC Review

Published

on

oil
  • Nigeria Losing Revenue to IOCs Over Delayed PSC Review

The delay of the much-talked about re-negotiation of the terms of the 1993 Production Sharing Contracts between the Federal Government and international oil companies is not only depriving the government of additional oil revenue, but also creating uncertainty in the nation’s oil and gas industry, our correspondent has learnt.

Industry operators and experts, who spoke with our correspondent in separate interviews, noted that the contracts were long overdue for re-negotiation.

The nation’s oil and gas production structure is mainly split between joint ventures, with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation onshore and in shallow water, and the PSCs in deep-water offshore.

Under the PSCs, the NNPC is the oil licence holder but engages oil firms as contractors that bear all risks and recover costs through a share of production at a tax rate of 50 per cent.

In September 2015, the then Group Managing Director of the NNPC, Dr. Ibe Kachikwu, who was the Vice Chairman and General Counsel of ExxonMobil Nigeria, one of the IOCs, said the corporation was set to revisit the fiscal terms of the existing PSCs entered into by the corporation with some IOCs with a view to seeking favourable benefits for Nigeria based on prevailing realities in the industry.

He said in the weeks and months ahead, the corporation would be re-negotiating the contracts as it “is allowed to make use of the window, which creates space for re-negotiation.”

“We intend to begin the process of the re-negotiation of the PSCs to see what value chain and improvements we can have from these contracts. Some of the contracts were negotiated over 20 years ago and they have since been overtaken by new realities in the industry,” he added.

But more than two years after, the contracts have yet to be re-negotiated.

Last week, the International Monetary Fund said it supported the authorities’ objective to ensure that the government’s take from oil exploration is appropriate.

“To that end, it welcomes the minimum royalty payment on all oil and gas production but notes that the proposed combination of price-based and production-based royalties is overly complicated and risks posing an unnecessary barrier to investment,” it stated.

Prior to the President Muhammadu Buhari administration, a former Minister of Petroleum and Presidential Chief Economic Adviser, Philip Asiodu, noted that the PSCs executed in 1993 had three re-opener conditions for re-negotiating the fiscal terms.

Highlighting the conditions, he said, “If the price of oil rose to $20 per barrel, this became a reality by 2000. If discoveries of reserves above 500 million barrels were made, this was achieved within seven years by a few consortia. In any case, after 10 years, this date was reached in 2003.”

Asiodu stated that he could see no rational explanation for not negotiating within the existing contracts to optimise the nation’s revenue up to the targets hoped for in the Petroleum Industry Bill, while waiting for it to become a law.

In 1993, the PSC was widely introduced to address some of the issues faced by the Joint Operating Agreement and to provide a suitable agreement structure for encouraging foreign investments in offshore acreage.

The Chief Executive Officer, Gacmork Nigeria Limited and ex-Chevron executive, Mr. Alex Neyin, said the contracts were lopsided in favour of the oil majors and “allow them to carry away more money.”

He said, “So, if they allow the re-negotiation to happen now, they will lose money. So why don’t you bribe and keep pushing it forward? That’s what is going on. It’s corruption. The previous PSCs were really bad agreements. I don’t know who agreed to such things.

“The bottom line is corruption. They know what is right. Everybody in the system knows what is right. But what is happening is that there is money moving under the table. So, on the basis of that, that creates inaction or delay for more money to be made by them. There is nowhere you have the sort of contracts. This is a corrupt package they call the PSCs.”

A petroleum expert, Mr. Bala Zakka, said Nigeria needed to appreciate the few oil majors that ventured to take the risk of exploring the nation’s deep-water.

He noted, “There is nothing wrong in re-negotiating the contracts but the government should not strangulate the IOCs by charging them so high. All the government needs to do is to see if there will be a little adjustment because at the end of the day, it is going to be a win-win situation.

“Over the years, some of us have noticed that some of the leaders we have, who are running the oil and gas industry, have not been consistent. They will make pronouncements about licensing round for oil fields, nothing will happen. They will say something about the turnaround maintenance of refineries, nothing will happen.”

An energy law expert and Partner, Bloomfied Law Practice, Mr. Ayodele Oni, added, “Anything that has to do with petroleum, because that is the mainstay of the Nigerian economy, is usually very controversial and is always filled with vested interests.

“In amending such statutory contracts, you need to carry along all stakeholders, and I am sure that’s part of the reason it is being delayed.”

He said the drop in oil prices had also been a challenge, and that the government should be careful not to scare away the oil majors.

A former Chairman, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Nigeria Council, Dr. Saka Matemilola, said there had been a lot of discussions between the IOCs and the government on the matter.

“We also need to realise that because of the uncertainty around this issue, there has been a lot of investments that have been put on hold for about 15 years now. If you look at the number of final investment decisions taken in the upstream over the last 15 years, it has been very few,” he added.

An energy expert and associate professor, University of Lagos, Dr. Ayoade Adedayo, said the government gave the IOCs generous terms to entice them to go into the deep-water space.

He noted that the re-negotiation should have been done when crude oil prices were very high.

Adedayo stated, “The government does not seem to have the political will to re-negotiate the contracts. When oil price was quite high, you refused to force them to the negotiation table. Is it now that the prices are just trying to recover that you now want to do this?

“When you say you want to re-negotiate and you don’t and nothing happens for years, you create uncertainty. It is better not to say you want to re-negotiate than to say you want to re-negotiate and fail to do it. If you want to re-negotiate and you announce it, what’s stopping you from re-negotiating?”

Last month, the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Kachikwu, lamented that the country had lost a lot of money to many PSCs.

Kachikwu, who stated this in Lagos during a visit to the Egina Floating Production, Storage and Offloading vessel at LADOL Free Zone, said, “We are going to begin to look at what is the net value for the country in this huge project. We are not as a country very impressed with a lot of the PSCs that we have put together. We lose a lot of money in the process.”

“This kind of thing will not happen anymore. So, the terms will change; the basis upon which we proceed will change. But Nigeria will continue to be a prolific economic return model for any country in the world in terms of oil production,” the minister added.

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Crude Oil

Brent Plunges Below $83 Amidst Rising US Stockpiles and Middle East Uncertainty

Published

on

Brent crude oil - Investors King

The global oil declined today as Brent crude prices plummeted below $83 per barrel, its lowest level since mid-March.

This steep decline comes amidst a confluence of factors, including a worrisome surge in US oil inventories and escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

On the commodity exchanges, Brent crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, experienced a sharp decline, dipping below the psychologically crucial threshold of $83 per barrel.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, the US benchmark, also saw a notable decrease to $77 per barrel.

The downward spiral in oil prices has been attributed to a plethora of factors rattling the market’s stability.

One of the primary drivers behind the recent slump in oil prices is the mounting stockpiles of crude oil in the United States.

According to industry estimates, crude inventories at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for WTI futures contracts, surged by over 1 million barrels last week.

Also, reports indicate a significant buildup in nationwide holdings of gasoline and distillates, further exacerbating concerns about oversupply in the market.

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East continue to add a layer of uncertainty to the oil market dynamics.

The Israeli military’s incursion into the Gazan city of Rafah has intensified concerns about the potential escalation of conflicts in the region.

Despite efforts to broker a truce between Israel and Hamas, designated as a terrorist organization by both the US and the European Union, a lasting peace agreement remains elusive, fostering an environment of instability that reverberates across global energy markets.

Analysts and investors alike are closely monitoring these developments, with many expressing apprehension about the implications for oil prices in the near term.

The recent downturn in oil prices reflects a broader trend of market pessimism, with indicators such as timespreads and processing margins signaling a weakening outlook for the commodity.

The narrowing of Brent and WTI’s prompt spreads to multi-month lows suggests that market conditions are becoming increasingly less favorable for oil producers.

Furthermore, the strengthening of the US dollar is compounding the challenges facing the oil market, as a stronger dollar renders commodities more expensive for investors using other currencies.

The dollar’s upward trajectory, coupled with oil’s breach below its 100-day moving average, has intensified selling pressure on crude futures, exacerbating the latest bout of price weakness.

In the face of these headwinds, some market observers remain cautiously optimistic, citing ongoing supply-side risks as a potential source of support for oil prices.

Factors such as the upcoming June meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) and the prospect of renewed curbs on Iranian and Venezuelan oil production could potentially mitigate downward pressure on prices in the coming months.

However, uncertainties surrounding the trajectory of global oil demand, geopolitical developments, and the efficacy of OPEC+ supply policies continue to cast a shadow of uncertainty over the oil market outlook.

As traders await official data on crude inventories and monitor geopolitical developments in the Middle East, the coming days are likely to be marked by heightened volatility and uncertainty in the oil markets.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Climb on Renewed Middle East Concerns and Saudi Supply Signals

Published

on

Crude oil

As global markets continue to navigate through geopolitical uncertainties, oil prices rose on Monday on renewed concerns in the Middle East and signals from Saudi Arabia regarding its crude supply.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigeria’s oil is priced, surged by 51 cents to $83.47 a barrel while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil rose by 53 cents to $78.64 a barrel.

The recent escalation in tensions between Israel and Hamas has amplified fears of a widening conflict in the key oil-producing region, prompting investors to closely monitor developments.

Talks for a ceasefire in Gaza have been underway, but prospects for a deal appeared slim as Hamas reiterated its demand for an end to the war in exchange for the release of hostages, a demand rejected by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The uncertainty surrounding the conflict was further exacerbated on Monday when Israel’s military called on Palestinian civilians to evacuate Rafah as part of a ‘limited scope’ operation, sparking concerns of a potential ground assault.

Analysts warned that such developments risk derailing ceasefire negotiations and reigniting geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

Adding to the bullish sentiment, Saudi Arabia announced an increase in the official selling prices (OSPs) for its crude sold to Asia, Northwest Europe, and the Mediterranean in June.

This move signaled the kingdom’s anticipation of strong demand during the summer months and contributed to the upward pressure on oil prices.

The uptick in prices comes after both Brent and WTI crude futures posted their steepest weekly losses in three months last week, reflecting concerns over weak U.S. jobs data and the timing of a potential Federal Reserve interest rate cut.

However, with most of the long positions in oil cleared last week, analysts suggest that the risks are skewed towards a rebound in prices in the early part of this week, particularly for WTI prices towards the $80 mark.

Meanwhile, in China, the world’s largest crude importer, services activity remained in expansionary territory for the 16th consecutive month, signaling a sustained economic recovery.

Also, U.S. energy companies reduced the number of oil and natural gas rigs operating for the second consecutive week, indicating a potential tightening of supply in the near term.

As global markets continue to navigate through geopolitical uncertainties and supply dynamics, investors remain vigilant, closely monitoring developments in the Middle East and their impact on oil prices.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Drop Sharply, Marking Steepest Weekly Decline in Three Months

Published

on

Crude Oil - Investors King

Amidst concerns over weak U.S. jobs data and the potential timing of a Federal Reserve interest rate cut, oil prices record its sharpest weekly decline in three months.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigerian oil is priced, settled 71 cents lower to close at $82.96 a barrel.

Similarly, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil fell 84 cents, or 1.06% to end the week at $78.11 a barrel.

The primary driver behind this decline was investor apprehension regarding the impact of sustained borrowing costs on the U.S. economy, the world’s foremost oil consumer. These concerns were amplified after the Federal Reserve opted to maintain interest rates at their current levels this week.

Throughout the week, Brent experienced a decline of over 7%, while WTI dropped by 6.8%.

The slowdown in U.S. job growth, revealed in April’s data, coupled with a cooling annual wage gain, intensified expectations among traders for a potential interest rate cut by the U.S. central bank.

Tim Snyder, an economist at Matador Economics, noted that while the economy is experiencing a slight deceleration, the data presents a pathway for the Fed to enact at least one rate cut this year.

The Fed’s decision to keep rates unchanged this week, despite acknowledging elevated inflation levels, has prompted a reassessment of the anticipated timing for potential rate cuts, according to Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS.

Higher interest rates typically exert downward pressure on economic activity and can dampen oil demand.

Also, U.S. energy companies reduced the number of oil and natural gas rigs for the second consecutive week, reaching the lowest count since January 2022, as reported by Baker Hughes.

The oil and gas rig count fell by eight to 605, with the number of oil rigs dropping by seven to 499, the most significant weekly decline since November 2023.

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict have somewhat eased as discussions for a temporary ceasefire progress with international mediators.

Looking ahead, the next meeting of OPEC+ oil producers is scheduled for June 1, where the group may consider extending voluntary oil output cuts beyond June if global oil demand fails to pick up.

In light of these developments, money managers reduced their net long U.S. crude futures and options positions in the week leading up to April 30, according to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending