Connect with us

Government

Ajaokuta: Reps Pass Vote of no Confidence in Fayemi, Minister of State

Published

on

Kayode Fayemi
  • Ajaokuta: Reps Pass Vote of no Confidence in Fayemi, Minister of State

The House of Representatives on Thursday passed a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Mines and Steel Development, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, and the Minister of State for Mines and Steel Development, Mr. Abubakar Bawa-Bwari.

The two ministers were absent at a sectoral debate on the steel sector scheduled by the House primarily to find solutions to the troubled Ajaokuta Steel Plant.

As Thursday’s plenary began, the Speaker, Mr. Yakubu Dogara, informed members on how he personally wrote Fayemi a letter on February 16, inviting him to address lawmakers on the state of affairs in the steel sector and on Ajaokuta in particular.

But, he said the minister replied on February 27, just two days to the debate, to say that he would be unavailable, while Bawa-Bwari too had other official engagements.

The minister’s reply was written on his behalf by the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Dr. Abdulkadir Muazu.

The Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, was scheduled to appear alongside with Fayemi on Thursday.

However, Dogara said while Adeosun called to explain that she was in Kaduna and would arrive in Abuja by 4pm to address the House, Fayemi merely said he was unavailable, but wished the House well.

The Speaker said he was amazed by the minister’s conduct, which appeared to give credence to the allegation that “some powerful interests” in the ministry had concluded arrangements to concession the steel complex.

He asked how a nation would toy with a plant that had consumed $5.1bn and was so critical to the survival of its economy.

“Could it be national sabotage? Or have we been bewitched by some sorcerers?

“The result of Ajaokuta today is a result of our inept attitude as a government. All government needs to complete the plant is leadership. We want end this national embarrassment.”

As the Speaker made to say that the debate would continue with or without Fayemi, lawmakers interrupted him. They sought to first register their displeasure over the conduct of Fayemi.

The Leader of the House, Mr. Femi Gbajabiamila, who was the first to speak, said the minister’s conduct amounted to contempt of the parliament.

Gbajabiamila added, “I consider this, and I believe we should call it exactly what it is – contempt of this House. You (Speaker) personally signed the letter to them; unfortunately, none of the ministers could sign their reply. Rather, they asked the permanent secretary to respond to you, two weeks after. The invitation that hasn’t been honoured is a serious contempt.

“This presentation gives an ample opportunity for fair hearing. There are allegations. I believe we should take this matter seriously. Whatever we should do here today should be moved to a powerful investigative hearing. Steel is probably more than the oil.

“I will personally take it as an assault to the common sense of this country for the two ministers to ignore, pooh-pooh and scorn an invitation of this chamber.”

The Chief Whip of the House, Mr. Alhassan Ado-Doguwa, supported Gbajabiamila’s position.

“The absence of the ministers simply confirms that there is something suspicious about Ajaokuta,” he stated.

The House Minority Whip, Mr. Yakubu Barde, also said he was in shock that the “All Progressives Congress’ ministers will shun the invitation of their APC leadership in the National Assembly.”

Other members, including Mr. Mohammed Bago, Mr. Uzoma Nkem-Abonta and Mr. Zakari Mohammed, also condemned the conduct of Fayemi and Bawa-Bwari.

The Speaker later asked Gbajabiamila to move a proper motion on what action should be taken against the ministers.

Gbajabiamila initially moved a motion that the House should set up an ad hoc committee to conduct an investigative hearing on the steel sector and to give Fayemi and Bawa-Bwari a second chance to address the House.

But members protested calling on Gbajabiamila to re-phrase the motion by prescribing penalties for the ministers.

The House leader, in re-phrasing the motion, stated that additional information just received by the House indicated that the ministers also “instructed” the Sole Administrator of Ajaokuta Steel Company, Mr. Samaila Abdul’Akaba, not to attend the sectoral debate.

He summarised by moving a “motion of vote of no confidence in the two ministers (Fayemi and Bawa-Bwari).”

The motion was seconded by an APC member from Osun State, Mrs. Ayo Omidiran, following which it was passed in a unanimous voice vote.

Experts in the steel sector and activists, including the Chairman, African Iron and Steel Producing Countries, Mr. Sanusi Mohammed, and Mrs. Hadiza Nathasha-Apoti, addressed the session.

However, Fayemi and Bwari have described as draconian the vote of no confidence passed in them in by the House of Representatives.

In a statement by Fayemi’s Special Assistant on Media, Mr. Olayinka Oyebode, the ministers said that they had informed the House in two separate letters that they would not be able to attend the meeting.

The statement read, “…One then wonders why the House members took such a draconian stance against the two ministers who have very cordial relationship with the National Assembly.

“It is rather unfair for the House members to categorise the ministers’ absence as boycott when they were adequately notified.

“Tolerance and moderation are essential ingredients in public service engagement. In this particular case, they appear to be in short supply and the ministry believes that there is more than meets the eye on this matter.

“After all, the ministers are always willing to engage the honourable House and its leadership at all times. It is on record that Minister Fayemi was the first minister to address the sectoral debate in 2016 and the Ajaokuta Steel Complex was extensively addressed on that occasion.

“Subsequently, the House Committees on Privatisation and Public Petitions held special sessions on Ajaokuta and the Minister of State, Bwari, addressed the members on those two occasions.

“Given this past record, today’s action is most unwarranted and unfortunate.”

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Government

Netanyahu Stands Firm as US Halts Bomb Shipment Over Rafah Invasion Warning

Published

on

Netanyahu

Amidst escalating tensions between Israel and the United States, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has adopted a defiant stance following the US decision to halt a shipment of bombs and warned against Israel’s potential invasion of the southern Gaza city of Rafah.

In a bold statement, Netanyahu declared, “If we have to stand alone, we will stand alone,” emphasizing Israel’s resolve to pursue its objectives despite opposition.

The Prime Minister’s comments, delivered via social media and a subsequent interview with American talk show host Dr. Phil, underscore Israel’s determination to address security threats posed by the Gaza Strip, particularly by Hamas militants operating in Rafah.

Netanyahu reiterated the necessity of military action in Rafah to eliminate the remaining Hamas battalions, condemned Hamas’s history of violence and reiterated Israel’s commitment to achieving victory and ensuring the safety of its citizens.

The US administration, led by President Joe Biden, expressed concerns over the potential humanitarian impact of an Israeli invasion of Rafah, prompting the decision to withhold additional offensive weapons shipments to Israel.

Biden’s statement echoed broader international apprehensions about the escalation of violence and civilian casualties in the conflict-stricken region.

However, Netanyahu remained resolute in Israel’s approach, asserting the country’s right to defend itself against security threats. He emphasized Israel’s efforts to minimize civilian casualties and facilitate the evacuation of civilians from Rafah before any military action.

Despite the US’s decision to pause the bomb shipment, Netanyahu affirmed Israel’s commitment to its longstanding alliance with the US. He acknowledged past disagreements between the two nations but expressed optimism about resolving current tensions through dialogue and cooperation.

In response, White House officials reiterated the US’s support for Israel’s security while urging restraint and emphasizing the need to avoid actions that could exacerbate the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The administration clarified that the decision to halt the bomb shipment was aimed at preventing potential civilian casualties in Rafah.

The confrontation between Israel and the US underscores the complexity of navigating regional conflicts and balancing strategic interests. As tensions persist, both nations face the challenge of reconciling their respective security imperatives with broader humanitarian concerns, seeking to avert further escalation while addressing the root causes of the conflict in the Middle East.

Continue Reading

Government

EFCC Declares Former Kogi Governor, Yahaya Bello, Wanted Over N80.2 Billion Money Laundering Allegations

Published

on

Yahaya Bello

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has escalated its pursuit of justice by declaring former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello, wanted over alleged money laundering amounting to N80.2 billion.

In a first-of-its-kind action, the EFCC announced Bello’s wanted status in connection with the alleged embezzlement of funds during his tenure as governor.

The commission, armed with a 19-count criminal charge, accused Bello and his cohorts of conspiring to launder the hefty sum, which was purportedly diverted from state coffers for personal gain.

The declaration of Bello as a wanted fugitive came after a series of failed attempts by the EFCC to effect his arrest.

Despite an ex-parte order from Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja, mandating the EFCC to apprehend and produce Bello in court for arraignment, the former governor managed to evade capture with the reported assistance of his successor, Governor Usman Ododo.

This latest development shows the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in holding powerful individuals accountable for their actions.

However, it also demonstrates the unwavering commitment of the EFCC to uphold the rule of law and ensure that justice is served, irrespective of the status or influence of the accused.

In response to the EFCC’s declaration, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, issued a stern warning to Bello, stating that fleeing from the law would not resolve the allegations against him.

Fagbemi urged Bello to honor the EFCC’s invitation and cooperate with the investigation process, saying it is important to uphold the rule of law and respect the authority of law enforcement agencies.

The EFCC’s pursuit of Bello underscores the agency’s mandate to combat corruption and financial crimes, sending a strong message that individuals implicated in corrupt practices will be held accountable for their actions.

Continue Reading

Government

Concerns Mount Over Security as National Identity Card Issuance Shifts to Banks

Published

on

NIMC enrolment

Amidst the National Identity Management Commission’s (NIMC) recent announcement that the issuance of the proposed new national identity card will be facilitated through applicants’ respective banks, concerns are escalating regarding the security implications of involving financial institutions in the distribution process.

The federal government, in collaboration with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigeria Inter-bank Settlement System (NIBSS), introduced a new identity card with payment functionality, aimed at streamlining access to social and financial services.

However, the decision to utilize banks as distribution channels has sparked apprehension among industry stakeholders.

Mr. Kayode Adegoke, Head of Corporate Communications at NIMC, clarified that applicants would request the card by providing their National Identification Number (NIN) through various channels, including online portals, NIMC offices, or their respective banks.

Adegoke emphasized that the new National ID Card would serve as a single, multipurpose card, encompassing payment functionality, government services, and travel documentation.

Despite NIMC’s assurances, concerns have been raised regarding the necessity and security implications of introducing a new identity card system when an operational one already exists.

Chief Deolu Ogunbanjo, President of the National Association of Telecoms Subscribers, questioned the rationale behind the new General Multipurpose Card (GMPC), citing NIMC’s existing mandate to issue such cards under Act No. 23 of 2007.

Ogunbanjo highlighted the successful implementation of MobileID by NIMC, which has provided identity verification for over 15 million individuals.

He expressed apprehension about integrating the new ID card with existing MobileID systems and raised concerns about data privacy and unauthorized duplication of ID cards.

Moreover, stakeholders are seeking clarification on the responsibilities for card blocking, replacement, and delivery in case of loss or theft, given the involvement of multiple parties, including banks, in the issuance process.

The shift towards utilizing banks for identity card issuance raises fundamental questions about data security, privacy, and the integrity of the identification process.

With financial institutions playing a pivotal role in distributing sensitive government documents, there are valid concerns about potential vulnerabilities and risks associated with this approach.

As the debate surrounding the security implications of the new national identity card continues to intensify, stakeholders are calling for greater transparency, accountability, and collaboration between government agencies and financial institutions to address these concerns effectively.

The paramount importance of safeguarding citizens’ personal information and ensuring the integrity of the identity verification process cannot be overstated, especially in an era of increasing digital interconnectedness and heightened cybersecurity threats.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending