Connect with us

Economy

FG Raises Infrastructure Allocation by 75% in Two Years

Published

on

firms
  • FG Raises Infrastructure Allocation by 75% in Two Years

The Federal Government has in the last two years increased the capital allocation to five key ministries by 75 per cent, an analysis of the 2018 budget provisions before the National Assembly has shown.

The combined provision for the execution of capital projects in the ministries of Power, Works and Housing; Transportation; Agriculture and Rural Development; Water Resources; and Industry, Trade and Investment in 2016 stood at N639.67bn.

However, allocations to the five key ministries in the proposed 2018 budget stand at N1.12tn.

This means that within a period of two years, the allocation to the five key ministries increased by N481bn or 75.27 per cent.

The 2016 budget provided the base because it was the first full budget drafted and implemented by the President Muhammadu Buhari administration.

Although the current administration took over power on May 29, 2015, it inherited a budget prepared by the previous administration led by President Goodluck Jonathan.

The Ministry of Power, Works and Housing received N422.97bn in 2016. This increased to N555.88bn in 2018.

The Ministry of Transportation received N188.67bn in 2016 and N263.1bn in 2018. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development received N46.17bn in 2016 and N118.98bn in 2018.

The Ministry of Water Resources received N46.06bn in 2016 and N95bn in 2018. The Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment, on the other hand, received N5.8bn in 2016 and N82.9bn in 2018.

In nominal terms, the increase reflects the concern of the government for infrastructure deficiency in the country.

Since inflation has also been on the downward trend in recent months, it can also be asserted that in real terms, the increases are a reflection of the government’s plan to build up infrastructure.

However, the expectation that expenditure on infrastructure will increase year-on-year is dashed when the capital provision for the 2017 budget is brought to the fore.

In 2017, the capital budget allocation to the infrastructure-bearing ministries stood at N1.03tn. This shows an increase of only 8.74 per cent.

A former President of the Nigerian Economic Society and currently Executive Director, African Centre for Shared Development Capacity Building, Prof. Olu Ajakaiye, is not disappointed at the minimal increase.

According to him, the 2017 budget was passed too late to be fully implemented; so, the 2018 budget should be a rollover of the current year’s, urging the National Assembly to pass the appropriation bill expeditiously to enable full implementation.

Meanwhile, the Coordinator, Nigeria Agribusiness Group, Mr. Emmanuel Ijewere, has said the 2018 provision for agriculture is below agreed terms.

He stated that the N118.9bn allocated to agriculture in the 2018 Appropriation Bill was far below what Nigeria and other African countries agreed and signed in the Maputo Agreement of 2013.

According to him, the Federal Government has never at any time been able to meet up with what it signed in the agreement with respect to funding agriculture in Nigeria.

Ijewere told one of our correspondents that it was agreed that member countries must allocate 10 per cent of their total budgets to agriculture in order to ensure adequate development of the sector.

This, he said, had not been met by the Federal Government despite the increase in allocation to agriculture in the 2018 Appropriation Bill.

Ijewere said, “It is true that the budget for agriculture was increased from N75bn in 2017 to N118.9bn in 2018, but under the Maputo Agreement, which Nigeria signed, every African country undertook and made a promise that the minimum budgetary allocation to agriculture would be 10 per cent of the entire budget for that specific period. Nigeria has never got there.

“In the 2017 budget, it was only 1.6 per cent. The N118.9bn that we have now in the 2018 budget of over N8tn is still a very far cry from what Nigeria appended its signature to, which is the Maputo Agreement that specifies 10 per cent of the total budget.”

He added, “Nigeria has said repeatedly that agriculture is the way to go and the vast majority of about 50 to 60 per cent of all the work that Nigerians do is in the agricultural industry. But the poorest of our people are in the agricultural industry.

“It is also important to note that despite all the claims by government that it wants to create jobs, it allocated such a little amount to agriculture without considering the Maputo Agreement.”

Ijewere noted that the increase was not impressive as more efforts were needed to diversify the economy, particularly through agriculture.

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Economy

IMF Urges Nigeria to End Fuel and Electricity Subsidies

Published

on

IMF global - Investors King

In a recent report titled “Nigeria: 2024 Article IV Consultation,” the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has advised the Nigerian government to terminate all forms of fuel and electricity subsidies, arguing that they predominantly benefit the wealthy rather than the intended vulnerable population.

The IMF’s recommendation comes amidst Nigeria’s struggle with record-high inflation and economic challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report highlights the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of subsidies, noting that they are costly and poorly targeted.

According to the IMF, higher-income groups tend to benefit more from these subsidies, resulting in a misallocation of resources. With pump prices and electricity tariffs currently below cost-recovery levels, subsidy costs are projected to increase significantly, reaching up to three percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2024.

The IMF suggests that once Nigeria’s social protection schemes are enhanced and inflation is brought under control, subsidies should be phased out.

The government’s social intervention scheme, developed with support from the World Bank, aims to provide targeted support to vulnerable households, potentially benefiting around 15 million households or 60 million Nigerians.

However, concerns persist regarding the removal of subsidies, particularly in light of the recent announcement of an increase in electricity tariffs by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC).

While the government has taken steps to reduce subsidies, including the removal of the costly petrol subsidy, there are lingering challenges in fully implementing these reforms.

Nigeria’s fiscal deficit is projected to be higher than anticipated, according to the IMF staff’s analysis.

The persistence of fuel and electricity subsidies is expected to contribute to this fiscal imbalance, along with lower oil and gas revenue projections and higher interest costs.

Continue Reading

Economy

IMF Warns of Challenges as Nigeria’s Economic Growth Barely Matches Population Expansion

Published

on

IMF - Investors King

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said Nigeria’s growth prospects will barely exceed its population expansion despite recent economic reforms.

Axel Schimmelpfennig, the IMF’s mission chief to Nigeria, who explained the risks to the nation’s economic outlook during a virtual briefing, acknowledged the strides made in implementing tough economic reforms but stressed that significant challenges persist.

The IMF reaffirmed its forecast of 3.3% economic growth for Nigeria in the current year, slightly up from 2.9% in 2023.

However, Schimmelpfennig revealed that this growth rate merely surpasses population dynamics and signaled a need for accelerated progress to enhance living standards significantly.

While Nigeria has received commendation for measures such as abolishing fuel subsidies and reforming the foreign-exchange regime under President Bola Tinubu’s administration, these reforms have not come without costs.

The drastic depreciation of the naira by 65% has fueled inflation to its highest level in nearly three decades, exacerbating the cost of living for many Nigerians.

The IMF anticipates a moderation of Nigeria’s annual inflation rate to 24% by the year’s end, down from the current 33.2% recorded in March.

However, the organization cautioned that substantial challenges persist, particularly in addressing acute food insecurity affecting millions of Nigerians with up to 19 million categorized as food insecure and a poverty rate of 46% in 2023.

Moreover, the IMF emphasized the importance of maintaining a tight monetary policy stance to curb inflation, preserve exchange rate flexibility, and bolster reserves.

It raised concerns about proposed amendments to the law governing the central bank, fearing that such changes could undermine its autonomy and weaken the institutional framework.

Looking ahead, Nigeria faces several risks, including potential shocks to agriculture and global food prices, which could exacerbate food insecurity.

Also, any decline in oil production would not only impact economic growth but also strain government finances, trade, and inflationary pressures.

Continue Reading

Economy

Nigeria’s Cash Transfer Scheme Shows Little Impact on Household Consumption, Says World Bank

Published

on

world bank - Investors King

The World Bank has said Nigeria’s conditional cash transfer scheme aimed at bolstering household consumption and financial inclusion is largely ineffective.

Despite significant investment and efforts by the Nigerian government, the program has shown minimal impact on the lives of its beneficiaries.

Launched in collaboration with the World Bank in 2016, the cash transfer initiative was designed to provide financial support to vulnerable Nigerians as part of the National Social Safety Nets Project.

However, the latest findings suggest that the program has fallen short of its intended goals.

The World Bank’s research revealed that the cash transfer scheme had little effect on household consumption, financial inclusion, or employment among beneficiaries.

Also, the program’s impact on women’s employment was noted to be minimal, highlighting systemic challenges in achieving gender parity in economic opportunities.

Despite funding a significant portion of the cash transfer program, the World Bank found no statistical evidence to support claims of improved financial inclusion or household consumption.

The report underscored the need for complementary interventions to generate sustainable improvements in households’ self-sufficiency.

According to the document, while there were some positive outcomes associated with the cash transfer program, such as increased household savings and food security, its overall impact remained limited.

Beneficiary households reported improvements in decision-making autonomy and freedom of movement but failed to see substantial gains in key economic indicators.

The findings come amid ongoing scrutiny of Nigeria’s social intervention programs, with concerns raised about transparency, accountability, and effectiveness.

The cash transfer scheme, once hailed as a critical tool in poverty alleviation, now faces renewed scrutiny as stakeholders call for comprehensive reforms to address its shortcomings.

In response to the World Bank’s report, government officials have emphasized their commitment to enhancing social safety nets and improving the effectiveness of cash transfer programs.

Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, reaffirmed the government’s intention to restart social intervention programs soon, following the completion of beneficiary verification processes.

As Nigeria grapples with economic challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and other structural issues, the need for impactful social welfare initiatives has become increasingly urgent.

The World Bank’s assessment underscores the importance of evidence-based policy-making and targeted interventions to address poverty and inequality in the country.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending