Connect with us

Government

CAN Urges NASS to Reject Expansion of Sharia Court to Criminal Matters

Published

on

ayo-oritsejafor
  • CAN Urges NASS to Reject Expansion of Sharia Court to Criminal Matters

The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) FCT Chapter, have called on the National Assembly (NASS) to reject the ongoing attempt to amend the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, by expanding the scope of the powers of the Sharia Court of Appeal to include criminal jurisdiction.

The FCT CAN in a statement issued yesterday under the aegis of Concerned Christians Citizens of Nigeria, urged the Federal House of Representatives to cease from entertaining the Bill tagged “The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria [Alteration] Bill 2016” sponsored by Hon. Abdullahi Balarabe Salame (APC Sokoto State), seeking for the amendment of sections 262[1], 262[2] and 277[1] and the deletion of section 277[2] of the 1999 Constitution.

“Our demand, therefore, is that the proposed Bill, which is self-serving and divisive, should outrightly be rejected. Any further attempt by the National Assembly to enact the Bill into law would further polarise the Nigerian nation along religious lines. This should be avoided by all means.

“We therefore, urge all Nigerians who have the interest of this country at heart to denounce this Bill for the sake of the unity, peace, progress, and prosperity of our dear country,” CAN demanded.

The concerned Christians noted that the Bill went through first reading and second reading in the House of Representatives without any debate before it was referred to the Ad Hoc Committee on Constitution Review.

They also gave a historical perspective in various attempts to smuggle Sharia law into the overall Nigerian legal jurisdiction with damning consequences for the citizens of other faith, particularly Christianity and traditional religions.

The group recalled that before the Second Republic, some Muslim citizens started the agitation for the full implementation of the Sharia law in Nigeria.

Part of the statement read: “The heated debates in the 1978 Constituent Assembly over the insertion of certain provisions relating to the 1979 Constitution are still fresh in our memories.

As a compromise, Sharia Personal Law, i.e., without the criminal aspects, was allowed to be included in the 1979 Constitution. It is clear from the relevant provisions of the 1979 Constitution that Sharia Personal Law was intended to apply strictly to Muslims in resolving their family and personal matters, such as inheritance, marriages, etc.

“Again, at the 1998 Constituent Assembly, another attempt was made to re-introduce Sharia Criminal Law into the Constitution. The uproar that greeted that attempt led to the then Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, to direct that the status quo be maintained by retaining the Sharia Personal Law provisions.

“Experience and studies have shown that some of our Muslim brothers have taken cover under the Sharia Personal Law in the Nigerian Constitution to declare their States “Sharia States” with legislations that proscribe and criminalise certain conducts: For instance, on 27th January, 2000 Zamfara State enacted the first Sharia Penal Code in Northern Nigeria.

“Since then, the following States, namely: Bauchi, Jigawa, Kano, Kebbi, Sokoto and Yobe have enacted completely new Penal Codes to replace the 1960 Penal Code applicable in the Northern States; along the same direction, Niger State amended the 1960 Penal Code Law by introducing a new section 68A to bring it in conformity with Sharia Penal Law. Meanwhile, work is ongoing in the preparation of Sharia Penal Code in Gombe, Kaduna and Katsina States.”

CAN gave detailed reason why they rejected the bill, top of which is the gross violation of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, citing Section 10 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 that reaffirms the status of Nigeria as a secular State.

That section provides that “The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion.”

“As clear as this provision is, some States in Northern Nigeria have flagrantly ignored this Constitutional Provision and have made Islam “State Religion” under the guise that Sharia is a way of life for all Muslims. Although the Christian religion is a way of life for all Christians, the Christian populace in Nigeria has never insisted that Christian Religious Principles be enshrined in the Constitution or in any law in this country.

“Our aversion to this Bill stems from the fact that the current abuse perpetrated against non-Muslims in the face of clear and restrictive provisions of the 1999 Constitution, would exacerbate uncontrollably once the power of the Sharia Court of Appeal is expanded to include criminal matters. Our point here is that allowing the Bill would amount to a clear violation of the provision of section 10 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” the group noted.

In the same vein, CAN said that the bill was a gross violation of their human rights, citing Section 38 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) guarantees the right of every Nigerian to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

The group claimed that proposed “Bill seeks to do is to discriminate against non-Muslims because all it does is to protect and provide for the interest of Muslims. Arming the Sharia Court of Appeal with adjudicatory powers in criminal matters, even if it is restricted to Islamic Criminal Jurisprudence, would be a weapon in the hands of overzealous Islamists who without such provision in the Constitution are already unleashing hardship and punishment on non-Muslims in the so-called Sharia States.”

“It is therefore our position that if passed into law, the proposed Bill would be a gross violation of the Fundamental Human Rights of Non-Muslims in Nigeria, particularly, Christians. It has the propensity or power to dehumanise all non-Muslims in many ways in addition to the gross negative effects of the Sharia Civil Law upon lives,” the group warned.

The concerned christians also listed alleged cases of flagrant impunity perpetrated against non-Muslims under the guise of Sharia law in parts of the north including the abduction in August, 2016 and forceful conversion of a 14-year old Christian girl, Habiba Ishaku, into Islam who was then married off to one Jamilu Lawal by the Emir of Katsina despite vehement objection from the father and other interest groups.

They also cited the July killing of the wife of a Pastor, Mrs. Eunice Elisha, by suspected Islamists at Kubwa, FCT, Abuja; and killing of the leader of a Christian Fellowship group, Mr. Nuhu Achi at the Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, by suspected Muslim students who claimed that Prophet Mohammed was blasphemed.

The statement stated further: “The killing of Mrs. Bridget Agbahime, a Christian business woman, in Kano on 2nd June, 2016 over allegation of blasphemy and the subsequent arraignment and discharge of the suspected perpetrators of this heinous crime by a Magistrate’s Court in Kano at the instance of the Honourable Attorney-General of Kano State, claiming that there was no case for the suspects to answer.

“The abduction and purported conversion of another 14-year-old girl, Ese Oruru, from Bayelsa State, who was taken to Kano State.”

Examples of other disadvantages suffered by Christians and non-Muslims under Sharia: The unwholesome denial of grant or renewal of rights of occupancy to churches and Christian Religious groups in the core North; sponsoring of only Muslims for pilgrimage for religious rites; and the construction of 90 mosques by the Jigawa State Government.

Is the CEO and Founder of Investors King Limited. He is a seasoned foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Business Insider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and other prominent platforms. With over two decades of experience in global financial markets, Olukoya is well-recognized in the industry.

Continue Reading
Comments

Government

Atiku Blasts Tinubu, Says President’s Haphazard Approach to Fuel Subsidy Caused Current Economic Crisis

Published

on

atiku-abubakar

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has slammed President Bola Tinubu’s handling of the fuel subsidy crisis, referring to him as “TPain.”

Atiku attributed the current economic challenges facing Nigeria to what he described as the “haphazard and disingenuous approach” of the Tinubu administration to fuel subsidy management.

In his statement posted on X on Thursday, Atiku bemoaned the escalating inflation rate, stating that it is severely impacting the lives of Nigerians.

He lamented that despite the growing hardships, Tinubu appears unfazed by the plight of the citizens.

According to him, the haphazard and disingenuous approach of the current administration to fuel subsidy management has been the reason the nation is witnessing current economic crisis.

He said as things stand, there will be no let up in the escalating inflation rate, which is drowning the material well-being of Nigerian populace.

The former VP said it is even more worrying that Tinubu, whom he referred as “T-pain”, is undisturbed by the hardship in the country.

The nickname ‘TPain’ for Tinubu emerged as a play on the first letter of his name and the name of American rapper and producer T-Pain, sparked by frustrations over the rising cost of living under his administration.

The earliest mention of the term on social media dates back to April 2024.

However, it gained significant traction around September 16, after a user on X used it while discussing the President’s visit to Maiduguri to console flood victims.

The term has gained traction on platforms like X and Instagram.

 

Continue Reading

Government

LG Autonomy: Senators Disagree as Governors Allegedly Mandate Chairmen to Move Allocations Into State Accounts

Published

on

Senate President Akpabio

Some members of the Nigerian Senate have expressed displeasure over alleged moves by state governors to thwart the feasibility for the implementation of the Financial Autonomy granted to the 774 Local Government Councils across the country by the Supreme Court in August this year.

There was hot debate amid confusion on Wednesday in the Senate soon after the sixth item which has to do with Petitions was handled when Senator Tony Nwoye from Labour Party in Anambra North came up with a Point of Order which was sustained by the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio.

Nwoye who came through orders 41 and 51 of the Senate Standing Rules, moved a motion on alleged moves by some state governments to circumvent the implementation of the judgement on LG Autonomy through counter laws from their respective State House of Assembly.

As he was still speaking to his colleagues at the hallowed Chamber, Nwoye ran into confusion over the matter, just as he told the Senate that nine other Senators had co-sponsored the motion.

He specifically alleged that some State Governors are already using their House of Assembly to enact laws that would mandate respective local government councils in their states to remit monies into State/Local Government Joint Accounts ruled against by the Supreme Court.

Immediately he rounded off his presentation containing six prayers for enforcement of the judgement and seconded by Senator Osita Izunaso, APC Imo West Senator Adamu Aliero, PDP Kebbi Central raised a constitutional point of order for stoppage of debate on the motion.

Adamu Aliero who cited section 287 of the 1999 Constitution that makes Supreme Court Judgement enforceable across the country, urged the Senate not to overflog the issue.

Aliero said the Supreme court judgement is enforceable across the country, adding that there is no need for the parliament to be debating anything that has to do with it.

Agreeing with Senator Aliero, Akpabio raised another constitutional issue as he called on the attention of Senators to section 162 sub-section 6 of the 1999 constitution.

The section according to Akpabio, created the State/Local Government Joint Account, which has to be amended in paving the way for full implementation of the Supreme Court Judgement.

Akpabio said what the Senate needs to do is to carry out required amendments of certain provisions of the constitution as far as local governments autonomy is concerned so as to ensure that local councils have their separate accounts.

But before taking a final decision on the motion, the sponsor, Senator Nwoye hurriedly raised order 42 of the Senate Standing rules for personal explanation on the motion the same time, Senator Abdulrahman Summaila Kawu, (NNPP Kano South) raised a similar point of order.

The simultaneous points of Order brought confusion into the session with many senators rushing to the Senate President for a personal consultation, which eventually, made the Senate go to an emergency closed-door session at exactly 12: 46. pm.

Recall that the Supreme Court had in early August this year, barred the 36 governors of the federation from further retaining or utilizing funds that are meant for the 774 Local Government Areas, LGAs, in the country.

The apex court ruled that it was illegal and unconstitutional for governors to continue to receive and seize funds allocated to LGAs in their states.

The Supreme Court had maintained that the “dubious practice” which has gone on for over two decades, was a clear violation of Section 162 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

In its lead judgement that was delivered by Justice Emmanuel Agim, the apex court held that no House of Assembly of any state has the power to make laws that could, in any manner, interfere with monies meant for the LGAs.

Stressing that the law mandated that LGAs must be governed by democratically elected officials, the Supreme Court ordered that forthwith, funds meant for the LGAs must be directly paid to them from the federation account.

Continue Reading

Government

I Knelt Down, Begged Wike for Peace to Reign in Rivers – Fubara Reveals Amid Tension 

Published

on

Siminalayi Fubara

Amid the growing political tension and upheaval in Rivers State, Governor Sim Fubara, has revealed that he has done everything possible for him to prevent the current panicking situation in the state.

According to him, he practically knelt down for his estranged political godfather, Nyesom Wike and begged him to let go of their feud, but the former governor rebuffed his pleas.

While speaking on a television political programme, Fubara went into memory lane on how he had strived to please the current Minister of the Federal Capital Territory Abuja, saying he (Fubara) kept all understanding with Wike.

The governor said he has been showing understanding in order not to expose the state to violence but added that the minister thwarted his good intentions for the state, hence the violence that has enveloped Rivers.

According to him, “There is nothing I have not done on this earth for peace to reign. I can tell you the number of times I have knelt to beg that let’s allow this issue to go. I have done everything.”

He therefore urged Wike, his predecessor, to allow peace to reign in the state by letting go of Rivers State.

Fubara stated that the current troubling situation in the riverine state has gotten to a point where Wike needs to let go and allow peace in the state.

Investors King had reported that Rivers was thrown into crisis on Monday, a day after the swearing-in of 22 winners of the controversial Saturday local government elections in the state.

The swearing-in of the chairmen from other political parties other than the ruling Peoples Democratic Party, had enraged Wike’s camp as hoodlums began attacking local government council secretariats, burning office equipment, files, chairs and tables, and equipment.

Disturbed by the ugly development, President Bola Tinubu had directed the Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, to secure Rivers State’s local government secretariats following the arsons.

Meanwhile, Olabode George, former deputy national chairman of the PDP, urged Wike to allow Fubara to work.

In a statement, George said asked Wike to leave Fubara alone and allow him to fastrack dividends of democracy for his people.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending