Connect with us

Markets

EWATA: Nigeria Losing Out on Global Cargo Transportation

Published

on

Shipowners
  • EWATA: Nigeria Losing Out on Global Cargo Transportation

The fact that Nigeria is not a member of the Europe West African Trade Agreement is costing her huge revenue in global shipping and cargo transportation, it has been learnt.

EWATA is an economic partnership agreement initiated by the European Union to include countries in the Economic Community of West African States and the West African Economic and Monetary Union.

The agreement takes into account the fact that West African trade is expanding; covering notably transportation and logistics, travel and business services; and the region is said to be the most important investment destination for the EU in Africa.

The agreement which also forms part of the Economic Partnership Agreement with Europe aims to establish a free trade area between 16 West African countries and the EU.

It promises to help West Africa to integrate better into the global trading system as well as support investment and economic growth in the region; increase West African exports to the EU; stimulate investment and contribute to developing productive capacity, with a positive effect on employment.

Nigeria had halted its planned entering into trade agreement with Europe for fear that its market might become a dumping ground for European goods produced under more efficient, technologically-driven, tax and credit-friendly environment.

Nigeria, also seen as the largest economy in Africa, has attracted a lot of interest from Europe and Asia seeking to trade with it.

But operators in Nigeria, citing unfavourable business environment and unfriendly tax and credit policies, have said that products from the advanced nations will be far cheaper and eventually crowd out the those produced in Nigeria.

Sharing the views of operators, President Muhammadu Buhari who also refused to sign the African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement declared, “We will not agree to anything that will undermine local manufacturers and entrepreneurs, or that may lead to Nigeria becoming a dumping ground for finished goods.”

The former President of Tanzania, Mr Benjamin Mkapa, who was a guest speaker at the 2017 Manufacturers Association of Nigeria’s Annual General Meeting, advised Nigerians against entering into trade agreements with Europe.

Mkapa had described EPA as an overture that meant more harm to Africa than good.

The country has however paid for refusing to sign the agreement. Apart from standing to lose out of trillions of dollars worth of trade benefits, the country is also losing out in the maritime trade and transportation sector.

According to the President, Shippers Association of Lagos State, Jonathan Nicol, Nigerian vessels cannot be permitted to carry cargo from Europe because Nigeria is not a member of the trade association.

“This is the cartel that they have formed and until we sign up, we cannot function in the maritime transport terrain,” he explained, saying that this was why Nigeria did not have sea-going vessels.

“In the 80s, (the administration of former President Olusegun) Obasanjo bought about 20 vessels meant for the international waters but over time, infrastructural decay set in and those vessels were no longer useful.

“Even if Nigeria were to operate a vessel, it would only convey produce to Europe and return without any cargo, whereas the foreign shipping lines that come to Nigeria bring cargoes and take cargoes back,” Nicol said.

He said without that cargo, the vessel would be operating at a loss.

The Director-General, Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Mr. Muda Yusuf, however stressed the need to build capacity of local operators to get them to compete in the maritime industry.

He noted that already Nigeria was trading in oil but not many indigenous operators were in that sector.

He said there ought to be policies that should deliberately encourage patronage of local operators.

“There are some countries you go to even in the West African sub-region, if you are a Nigerian, you cannot clear any cargo there.

“But here, everybody is clearing cargo, to the extent that many of our indigenous people are crowded out. It is about putting our own people first; let’s position them, if they don’t have capacity, let us support them to have capacity.”

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Dip on Sluggish Demand Signs and Fed’s Interest Rate Outlook

Published

on

crude-oil-production

Oil prices on Monday dipped as the U.S. Federal Reserve officials’ comments showed a cautious approach to interest rate adjustments.

The dip in prices reflects concerns over the outlook for global economic growth and its implications for energy consumption in the world’s largest economy.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigerian oil is priced, slipped by 7 cents or 0.1% to $82.72 per barrel while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil stood at $78.21 per barrel, a 5 cents decline.

Auckland-based independent analyst Tina Teng highlighted that the oil market’s focus has shifted from geopolitical tensions in the Middle East to the broader world economic outlook.

Concerns arose as China’s producer price index (PPI) contracted in April, signaling continued sluggishness in business demand.

Similarly, recent U.S. economic data suggested a slowdown, further dampening market sentiment.

The discussions among Federal Reserve officials regarding the adequacy of current interest rates to stimulate inflation back to the desired 2% level added to market jitters.

While earlier in the week, concerns over supply disruptions stemming from the Israel-Gaza conflict had provided some support to oil prices, the attention has now turned to macroeconomic indicators.

Analysts anticipate that the U.S. central bank will maintain its policy rate at the current level for an extended period, bolstering the dollar.

A stronger dollar typically makes dollar-denominated oil more expensive for investors holding other currencies, thus contributing to downward pressure on oil prices.

Furthermore, signs of weak demand added to the bearish sentiment in the oil market. ANZ analysts noted that U.S. gasoline and distillate inventories increased in the week preceding the start of the U.S. driving season, indicating subdued demand for fuel.

Refiners globally are grappling with declining profits for diesel, driven by increased supplies and lackluster economic activity.

Despite the prevailing challenges, expectations persist that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and their allies, collectively known as OPEC+, may extend supply cuts into the second half of the year.

Iraq, the second-largest OPEC producer, expressed commitment to voluntary oil production cuts and emphasized cooperation with member countries to stabilize global oil markets.

However, Iraq’s suggestion that it had fulfilled its voluntary reductions and reluctance to agree to additional cuts proposed by OPEC+ members stirred speculation and uncertainty in the market.

ING analysts pointed out that Iraq’s ability to implement further cuts might be limited, given its previous shortfall in adhering to voluntary reductions.

Meanwhile, in the United States, the oil rig count declined to its lowest level since November, signaling a potential slowdown in domestic oil production.

As oil markets continue to grapple with a complex web of factors influencing supply and demand dynamics, investors and industry stakeholders remain vigilant, closely monitoring developments and adjusting their strategies accordingly in an ever-evolving landscape.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Brent Crude Hovers Above $84 as Demand Rises in U.S. and China

Published

on

Crude Oil - Investors King

Brent crude oil continued its upward trajectory above $84 a barrel as demand in the United States and China, the two largest consumers of crude globally increased.

This surge in demand coupled with geopolitical tensions in the Middle East has bolstered oil markets, maintaining Brent crude’s resilience above $84 a barrel.

The latest data revealed a surge in demand, particularly in the U.S. where falling crude inventories coincided with higher refinery runs.

This trend indicates growing consumption patterns and a positive outlook for oil demand in the world’s largest economy.

In China, oil imports for April exceeded last year’s figures, driven by signs of improving trade activity, as exports and imports returned to growth after a previous contraction.

ANZ Research analysts highlighted the ongoing strength in demand from China, suggesting that this could keep commodity markets well supported in the near term.

The positive momentum in demand from these key economies has provided a significant boost to oil prices in recent trading sessions.

However, amidst these bullish indicators, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have added further support to oil markets. Reports of a Ukrainian drone attack setting fire to an oil refinery in Russia’s Kaluga region have heightened concerns about supply disruptions and escalated tensions in the region.

Also, ongoing conflict in the Gaza Strip has fueled apprehensions of broader unrest, particularly given Iran’s support for Palestinian group Hamas.

Citi analysts emphasized the geopolitical risks facing the oil market, pointing to Israel’s actions in Rafah and growing tensions along its northern border. They cautioned that such risks could persist throughout the second quarter of 2024.

Despite the current bullish sentiment, analysts anticipate a moderation in oil prices as global demand growth appears to be moderating with Brent crude expected to average $86 a barrel in the second quarter and $74 in the third quarter.

The combination of robust demand from key economies like the U.S. and China, coupled with geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, continues to influence oil markets with Brent crude hovering above $84 a barrel.

As investors closely monitor developments in both demand dynamics and geopolitical events, the outlook for oil prices remains subject to ongoing market volatility and uncertainty.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Brent Plunges Below $83 Amidst Rising US Stockpiles and Middle East Uncertainty

Published

on

Brent crude oil - Investors King

The global oil declined today as Brent crude prices plummeted below $83 per barrel, its lowest level since mid-March.

This steep decline comes amidst a confluence of factors, including a worrisome surge in US oil inventories and escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

On the commodity exchanges, Brent crude, the international benchmark for oil prices, experienced a sharp decline, dipping below the psychologically crucial threshold of $83 per barrel.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, the US benchmark, also saw a notable decrease to $77 per barrel.

The downward spiral in oil prices has been attributed to a plethora of factors rattling the market’s stability.

One of the primary drivers behind the recent slump in oil prices is the mounting stockpiles of crude oil in the United States.

According to industry estimates, crude inventories at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for WTI futures contracts, surged by over 1 million barrels last week.

Also, reports indicate a significant buildup in nationwide holdings of gasoline and distillates, further exacerbating concerns about oversupply in the market.

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East continue to add a layer of uncertainty to the oil market dynamics.

The Israeli military’s incursion into the Gazan city of Rafah has intensified concerns about the potential escalation of conflicts in the region.

Despite efforts to broker a truce between Israel and Hamas, designated as a terrorist organization by both the US and the European Union, a lasting peace agreement remains elusive, fostering an environment of instability that reverberates across global energy markets.

Analysts and investors alike are closely monitoring these developments, with many expressing apprehension about the implications for oil prices in the near term.

The recent downturn in oil prices reflects a broader trend of market pessimism, with indicators such as timespreads and processing margins signaling a weakening outlook for the commodity.

The narrowing of Brent and WTI’s prompt spreads to multi-month lows suggests that market conditions are becoming increasingly less favorable for oil producers.

Furthermore, the strengthening of the US dollar is compounding the challenges facing the oil market, as a stronger dollar renders commodities more expensive for investors using other currencies.

The dollar’s upward trajectory, coupled with oil’s breach below its 100-day moving average, has intensified selling pressure on crude futures, exacerbating the latest bout of price weakness.

In the face of these headwinds, some market observers remain cautiously optimistic, citing ongoing supply-side risks as a potential source of support for oil prices.

Factors such as the upcoming June meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC+) and the prospect of renewed curbs on Iranian and Venezuelan oil production could potentially mitigate downward pressure on prices in the coming months.

However, uncertainties surrounding the trajectory of global oil demand, geopolitical developments, and the efficacy of OPEC+ supply policies continue to cast a shadow of uncertainty over the oil market outlook.

As traders await official data on crude inventories and monitor geopolitical developments in the Middle East, the coming days are likely to be marked by heightened volatility and uncertainty in the oil markets.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending