Connect with us

Economy

Debt Servicing Gulps N928bn in Six Months

Published

on

debt
  • Debt Servicing Gulps N928bn in Six Months

The Federal Government spent a total of N927.74bn in the first half of this year to service the nation’s loan obligations to local and external creditors, figures obtained from the Budget Office of the Federation have revealed.

The amount is N7.07bn higher than the prorated sum of N920.67bn expected to be spent from January to June this year.

A breakdown of the N927.74n debt service figure showed that it costs the Federal Government the sum of N871.94bn to maintain its domestic debt in the first six months of this year.

This represents about 94 per cent of the entire amount spent on debt service.

The amount spent on foreign debt service was put at N55.8bn, which is about six per cent of the total.

Nigeria’s public debt has increased significantly in recent years as the Federal Government has increased borrowing to finance its budget deficit.

While the Federal Government has maintained that the country currently has low debt levels relative to total output, experts have argued that the low ratio to revenue poses substantial risk to the public debt portfolio.

The Medium Term Expenditure Framework, which contains the government’s fiscal strategy for the 2018 to 2020 period, puts Nigeria’s total public debt stock at N19.16tn, representing about 18 per cent of the nominal Gross Domestic Product.

The document stated that the Federal Government’s domestic debt stock accounted for 63 per cent of the total debt, while the states’ domestic debts were 15 per cent.

It added that the external debts of both federal and state governments represented the residual of 22 per cent.

It noted that the domestic debt represented 80 per cent of the debt stock of the federation.

The rising domestic debt profile, according to the document, is part of an ongoing strategy to deepen the domestic debt market and reduce exposure to exchange rate risks associated with debt contracted in foreign currencies.

This strategy, the government said, had yielded good results with the development of several debt instruments.

However, it was learnt that the rising cost of servicing the domestic debt had led to a realignment of the strategy.

This, according to the government, will entail a rebalancing of the debt portfolio from 84:16 distribution between domestic and external debt, to a 60:40 ratio by the end of the 2019 fiscal year.

The implications of this, according on the MTEF, is that longer term external financing will form a significant part of Nigeria’s debt portfolio going forward.

To mitigate exchange rate risks, the document stated that new borrowing would be contracted to fund investment projects at concessional rates where possible.

It explained that projects to be financed with external loans would be those supporting non-oil export and reducing import dependence, such that there would be no risk of external debt overhang.

It stated, “Nigeria’s public debt has increased significantly in recent years as the Federal Government has increased borrowing to finance its budget deficit. Although the country currently has low debt levels relative to total output, its low ratio to revenue poses substantial risk to the public debt portfolio.

“Yet the country needs additional resources, including debt resources to fund economic recovery and diversification. Government is cautious of the implications of its expansive fiscal policy programme under a tight revenue profile. The fiscal deficit will be maintained within the three per cent level stipulated by the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2007 but at an average of about 1.93 per cent of the GDP, but declining to less than one per cent by 2020.”

It added, “Debt financing will be restructured gradually in favour of foreign financing, while domestic financing is de-emphasized.

“Thus, while the proportionate share of foreign financing will increase from the current level of about 28 per cent to almost 72 per cent in 2020, domestic financing will decrease gradually from about 54 per cent in 2016 to about 26 per cent in 2020.

“This will prevent the crowding out of the private sector and accord private capital a leading role in driving growth.”

Finance and economic experts, who spoke on the development, cautioned the Federal Government against further borrowing.

They stated that the country’s debt profile of N19tn was becoming unsustainable as it might be difficult to service it owing to revenue challenges.

The experts advised that rather than continue to rely on borrowing to finance its activities, the Federal Government should adopt other sources of funding the infrastructure needs of the country such as concession, privatisation, and public-private partnership arrangement.

Those that spoke to our correspondent in separate telephone interviews are the President, Institute of Fiscal Studies of Nigeria, Mr. Godwin Ighedosa; and the Director-General, Abuja Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Mr. Chijioke Ekechukwu.

Ekechukwu said, “It is expected that the debt profile of the country will rise considering the fact that we have a deficit budget and even the deficit side of the budget was not met in the last budget year.

“With the recession of last year, the government will need to continue borrowing to meet the increased size of the deficit. Of course, the borrowing portends danger for the economy, because our debt profile is rising and we do not know when we are going to scale it down.”

In his comment, Ighedosa stated that while it was not bad to borrow, there was a need for a reduction in government expenditure

He added, “We have a high fiscal deficit, which can only be funded through borrowing. When you borrow for investment, it improves the position on your balance sheet but when you borrow for consumption, it can cause problems for the economy as it will affect the level of confidence in the economy from investors, because they will assume we can’t manage our economy.

“We already have a debt overhang, and as it is, we are building that up and so there is a need to reduce the rate of borrowing.”

But defending the government’s borrowing, the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, expressed confidence that the Federal Government’s revenue and debt management strategy would mitigate the country’s debt service risk and fast-track its development.

The minister noted that the government was refinancing its inherited debt portfolio and this would lead to significant benefits, particularly a reduction in cost of funds.

She said, “The proposed refinancing of $3bn worth of short-term treasury bills into longer tenured international debt is expected to save N91.65bn per annum.

“Other benefits of our revenue and debt management strategy include improvement in foreign reserves as well as reduced domestic debt demand, which will reduce crowding-out of the private sector, and support the aspirations of the monetary authorities to bring down interest rates.”

While welcoming the advice of Nigeria’s international development partners, including the International Monetary Fund, Adeosun said the strategy would achieve a number of objectives for the country.

She stated that a key element of the economic reform strategy was the mobilisation of revenue to improve the debt service to revenue ratio.

Is the CEO/Founder of Investors King Limited. A proven foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Businessinsider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and many more. He has over two decades of experience in global financial markets.

Continue Reading
Comments

Economy

IMF Warns of Challenges as Nigeria’s Economic Growth Barely Matches Population Expansion

Published

on

IMF - Investors King

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said Nigeria’s growth prospects will barely exceed its population expansion despite recent economic reforms.

Axel Schimmelpfennig, the IMF’s mission chief to Nigeria, who explained the risks to the nation’s economic outlook during a virtual briefing, acknowledged the strides made in implementing tough economic reforms but stressed that significant challenges persist.

The IMF reaffirmed its forecast of 3.3% economic growth for Nigeria in the current year, slightly up from 2.9% in 2023.

However, Schimmelpfennig revealed that this growth rate merely surpasses population dynamics and signaled a need for accelerated progress to enhance living standards significantly.

While Nigeria has received commendation for measures such as abolishing fuel subsidies and reforming the foreign-exchange regime under President Bola Tinubu’s administration, these reforms have not come without costs.

The drastic depreciation of the naira by 65% has fueled inflation to its highest level in nearly three decades, exacerbating the cost of living for many Nigerians.

The IMF anticipates a moderation of Nigeria’s annual inflation rate to 24% by the year’s end, down from the current 33.2% recorded in March.

However, the organization cautioned that substantial challenges persist, particularly in addressing acute food insecurity affecting millions of Nigerians with up to 19 million categorized as food insecure and a poverty rate of 46% in 2023.

Moreover, the IMF emphasized the importance of maintaining a tight monetary policy stance to curb inflation, preserve exchange rate flexibility, and bolster reserves.

It raised concerns about proposed amendments to the law governing the central bank, fearing that such changes could undermine its autonomy and weaken the institutional framework.

Looking ahead, Nigeria faces several risks, including potential shocks to agriculture and global food prices, which could exacerbate food insecurity.

Also, any decline in oil production would not only impact economic growth but also strain government finances, trade, and inflationary pressures.

Continue Reading

Economy

Nigeria’s Cash Transfer Scheme Shows Little Impact on Household Consumption, Says World Bank

Published

on

world bank - Investors King

The World Bank has said Nigeria’s conditional cash transfer scheme aimed at bolstering household consumption and financial inclusion is largely ineffective.

Despite significant investment and efforts by the Nigerian government, the program has shown minimal impact on the lives of its beneficiaries.

Launched in collaboration with the World Bank in 2016, the cash transfer initiative was designed to provide financial support to vulnerable Nigerians as part of the National Social Safety Nets Project.

However, the latest findings suggest that the program has fallen short of its intended goals.

The World Bank’s research revealed that the cash transfer scheme had little effect on household consumption, financial inclusion, or employment among beneficiaries.

Also, the program’s impact on women’s employment was noted to be minimal, highlighting systemic challenges in achieving gender parity in economic opportunities.

Despite funding a significant portion of the cash transfer program, the World Bank found no statistical evidence to support claims of improved financial inclusion or household consumption.

The report underscored the need for complementary interventions to generate sustainable improvements in households’ self-sufficiency.

According to the document, while there were some positive outcomes associated with the cash transfer program, such as increased household savings and food security, its overall impact remained limited.

Beneficiary households reported improvements in decision-making autonomy and freedom of movement but failed to see substantial gains in key economic indicators.

The findings come amid ongoing scrutiny of Nigeria’s social intervention programs, with concerns raised about transparency, accountability, and effectiveness.

The cash transfer scheme, once hailed as a critical tool in poverty alleviation, now faces renewed scrutiny as stakeholders call for comprehensive reforms to address its shortcomings.

In response to the World Bank’s report, government officials have emphasized their commitment to enhancing social safety nets and improving the effectiveness of cash transfer programs.

Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, reaffirmed the government’s intention to restart social intervention programs soon, following the completion of beneficiary verification processes.

As Nigeria grapples with economic challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and other structural issues, the need for impactful social welfare initiatives has become increasingly urgent.

The World Bank’s assessment underscores the importance of evidence-based policy-making and targeted interventions to address poverty and inequality in the country.

Continue Reading

Economy

DR Congo-China Deal: $324 Million Annually for Infrastructure Hinges on Copper Prices

Published

on

In a significant development for the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a newly revealed contract sheds light on a revamped minerals-for-infrastructure deal with China, signaling billions of dollars in financing contingent upon the price of copper.

This pivotal agreement, signed in March as an extension to a 2008 pact, underscores the intricate interplay between commodity markets and infrastructure development in resource-rich nations.

Under the terms of the updated contract, the DRC stands to receive a substantial injection of $324 million annually for infrastructure projects from its Chinese partners through 2040.

However, there’s a catch: this funding stream is directly linked to the price of copper. As long as the price of copper remains above $8,000 per ton, the DRC is entitled to this considerable sum to bolster its infrastructure.

The latest data indicates that copper is currently trading at $9,910 per ton, well above the threshold specified in the contract.

This bodes well for the DRC’s ambitious infrastructure plans, as the nation seeks to rebuild its road network, which has suffered from decades of neglect and conflict.

However, the contract also outlines a dynamic mechanism that adjusts funding levels based on copper price fluctuations.

Should the price exceed $12,000 per ton, the DRC stands to benefit further, with 30% of the additional profit earmarked for additional infrastructure projects.

Conversely, if copper prices fall below $8,000, the funding will diminish, ceasing altogether if prices dip below $5,200 per ton.

One of the most striking aspects of the contract is the extensive tax exemptions granted to the project, providing a significant financial incentive for both parties involved.

The contract stipulates a total exemption from all indirect or direct taxes, duties, fees, customs, and royalties through the year 2040, further enhancing the attractiveness of the deal for both the DRC and its Chinese partners.

This minerals-for-infrastructure deal, centered around the joint mining venture known as Sicomines, underscores the DRC’s strategic partnership with China, a key player in global commodity markets.

With China Railway Group Ltd., Power Construction Corp. of China (PowerChina), and Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt Co. holding a majority stake in Sicomines, the project represents a significant collaboration between the DRC and Chinese entities.

According to the contract, the total value of infrastructure loans under the deal amounts to a staggering $7 billion between 2008 and 2040, with a substantial portion already disbursed.

This infusion of capital is expected to drive socio-economic development in the DRC, leveraging its vast mineral resources to fund much-needed infrastructure projects.

As the DRC navigates the intricacies of global commodity markets, particularly the volatile copper market, this minerals-for-infrastructure deal with China presents both opportunities and challenges.

While it offers a vital lifeline for infrastructure development, the nation must remain vigilant to ensure that its long-term interests are safeguarded in the face of evolving market dynamics.

Continue Reading
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending