Connect with us

Social Media

Social Media Censorship: Africa is The Most Censorship-intensive Region, Accounting for 53 Percent of All Cases

Published

on

A new report has shown that when it comes to social media censorship, Africa is the most censorship-intensive region, accounting for nearly 53 percent of all cases in 2021 alone.

In the annual report put together by Surfshark, a cybersecurity company, social media censorship cases decline by 35 percent globally – down from 29 in 2020 to 19 in 2021. However, despite the notable decrease in cases “internet disruptions affected approximately a quarter of a billion people.”

In Africa, the majority of social media censorship happened during political events like elections and protests. The report noted that 37 percent of all shutdown cases were during protests while elections period accounted for the remaining 21 percent.

Earlier this year, the Nigerian government ban Twitter after the Jack Dorsey-led platform was accused of sponsoring the now famous EndSars protest in the country and trying to silence the president of Africa’s largest economy, President Muhammadu Buhari, by censoring a tweet from presidential handle for violating Twitter’s hate policy.

Even though the censorship numbers were lower in 2021, they followed a similar trend to last year. The shutdowns usually targeted apps like WhatsApp, Skype, Facebook Messenger, Viber, and platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Moreover, the vast majority of the social media shutdown cases were politics-related:

  • Seven cases (37%) affected countries suffering from protests (Burkina Faso, South Sudan, Senegal, Iran, Russia, Cuba, and Columbia).
  • Four cases (21%) affected countries during the presidential elections (Congo, Uganda, Zambia, and Russia).
  • The remaining eight cases (44%) occurred during general political turmoil (Chad, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Sudan, Armenia, Bangladesh, Iran, and Myanmar).

In comparison, out of 29 social media restriction cases in 2020, six were ordered amid elections, and eight more happened during various protests.

“In terms of politics, 2021 has been more stable than 2020, albeit still far from ideal. However, countries are evidently not afraid to pull the trigger on social media in areas of political turmoil. This is still especially true in Africa and Asia. And while this year showed a positive turn with fewer social media bans, it is yet to be seen whether the trend will continue in 2022 and beyond”, – says Vytautas Kaziukonis, CEO of Surfshark.

Incidents crippled communication for millions of people in times of political distress and a global pandemic. According to Surfshark’s study, 250 million people were affected during the blockings.

This year, Africa has become the most censorship-intensive continent across the globe, responsible for 10 (nearly 53%) of the cases in 2021. Its shutdowns were also the most political-heavy:

  • Africa led the social media shutdown numbers during election days (3 out of 4 total cases were in Congo, Uganda, and Zambia).
  • Chad blocked the internet following a raid at the property of Yaya Dillo, a representative of Chad’s government opposition. This event took place on February 28th, around two months before the presidential election.
  • Ethiopia claimed their social media blackout was due to leaked 12-grade exam papers. However, most people believe the internet was blocked when rebel forces claimed to have seized strategic towns.

About Surfshark

Surfshark, a Gold winner of the Most Innovative Security Service of the Year at the 2021 Cybersecurity Excellence awards , is a privacy protection toolset developed to provide its users with the ability to control their online presence seamlessly. The core premise of Surfshark is to humanize online privacy protection and develop tools that protect users’ privacy beyond the realm of a virtual private network. Surfshark is one of very few VPNs which have been audited by independent security experts.

Is the CEO and Founder of Investors King Limited. He is a seasoned foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Business Insider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and other prominent platforms. With over two decades of experience in global financial markets, Olukoya is well-recognized in the industry.

Continue Reading
Comments

Social Media

Telegram to Expose Users Who Use Platform For Criminal Activities, Share Data With Relevant Authorities 

Published

on

Telegram

With a view to joining efforts at waging war against cybercrime and other illicit activities on social media, a popular messaging app, Telegram has reviewed its users’ privacy and protection policy by announcing its readiness to make personal details of defaulting users available to relevant authorities for investigation.

The Telegram Chief Executive Officer, Pavel Durov, in a post sighted by Investors King, disclosed that the reversal of the company’s privacy policy was in response to alleged criminal activities and other illicit events happening on the popular social messaging platform.

Durov declared that once Telegram gets valid legal requests for the provision of the users’ IP addresses and phone numbers to authorities, the management would not hesitate in obliging the court order.

He said the move is to attempt to control criminal activity on the platform and prevent abuse.

Recall that Telegram’s policy, before it was changed, limited user information sharing to cases involving terror suspects.

However, Telegram tinkered with the policy following the arrest of its CEO, Durov in France over allegations that the company pretended not to notice the alleged various crimes flourishing unchecked on the platform.

Investors King also gathered that policy reversal is not unconnected with the recent decision of the Ukrainian government to ban the use of Telegram by government officials, military personnel, and other defense and critical infrastructure workers because of national security concerns.

Meanwhile, after Durov was subsequently released on bail and ordered to stay in the country pending ongoing investigation, he made it clear that the IP addresses and phone numbers of those who violate Telegram’s rules would now be made available to relevant authorities subject to valid legal requests.

The company further stated that if it receives a valid order from the relevant judicial authorities that confirms that any of its users is a suspect in a case involving criminal activities that violate the Telegram Terms of Service, it will perform a legal analysis of the request and may disclose affected user’s IP address and phone number to the relevant authorities.

It added that such data disclosures will be included in its periodic transparency reports, noting that the service may collect metadata such as IP address, devices and Telegram apps used, and the history of username changes to tackle spam, abuse, and other violations.

The platform has already featured the policy changes on its app as its search feature now removes problematic content and provides a new mechanism for users to report illegal search terms and material through the @SearchReport bot for subsequent review and removal by a human moderation team.

Continue Reading

Social Media

Telegram Was Adding Nearly 500,000 Users Daily Before Durov’s Arrest

Published

on

Telegram

Ever since it launched in August 2013, Telegram has been an exceptionally popular social media platform and messaging app, thanks to its utility and focus on privacy.

Telegram’s strong growth continued well into 2024. Finbold’s research found that, between April 10 and July 22, the platform added more than 485,000 monthly active users (MoU) every day.

The growth ensured that, by the middle of the summer, Telegram’s user base stood at 950 million – meaning that approximately one-eighth of humanity was using the app.

While coming just 50 million shy of 1 billion users is a major milestone, it is interesting to note that the social media platform has, at times, boasted even stronger growth. For example, in July 2023, the CEO and founder, Pavel Durov, revealed that 2.5 million people signed up to Telegram daily.

EU’s shadow over Telegram

Despite Telegram’s popularity and momentum, the platform has been gaining a different kind of attention since August 24 when the French police arrested Durov at an airport near Paris.

Though President Emmanuel Macron and his government maintain that the arrest was not politically motivated, it has nonetheless sparked a strong backlash, with many interpreting it as a crackdown on privacy and free speech.

Indeed, even the allegations of poor moderation and failure to prevent illicit activity are founded, they, nonetheless, raise important questions in the debate on the balance between privacy, surveillance, and national security.

As Andreja Stojanovic, a co-author of the research, noted “Even if genuine and undisputable illicit activity on Telegram was detected, the arrest is still likely to make many question if, by the same logic, the entire police force of a nation should be prosecuted whenever any illegal activity takes place in a private home or a hotel room.”

Nonetheless, there are no guarantees the arrest will have a profound impact on Telegram itself and, indeed, the platform has already shown significant resilience to government pressure during the Russian 2018 ban.

Continue Reading

Social Media

Russia Questions Legitimacy of France’s Arrest Warrant for Telegram’s Pavel Durov

Published

on

Telegram

Russia has issued a stern rebuke to France over the recent arrest warrant issued for Pavel Durov, the CEO and founder of the popular messaging app Telegram.

The Kremlin has raised significant concerns about the validity of the charges against Durov, suggesting that the move could be politically motivated.

On Saturday, the Paris Public Prosecutor’s Office issued a warrant for Durov’s arrest, citing an ongoing investigation into organized crime, drug trafficking, fraud, and the distribution of pornographic images of minors on Telegram.

This development came as a shock to many, given Durov’s prominence as a leading technology entrepreneur and a vocal advocate for internet freedom.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded sharply to the French authorities’ actions during a press briefing on Tuesday.

Peskov demanded that Paris provide concrete evidence to substantiate the serious allegations against Durov.

He warned that without a robust basis for these accusations, the arrest could be perceived as a direct assault on free speech and a potential act of political intimidation.

“The charges against Durov are gravely serious and must be supported by equally serious evidence,” Peskov told journalists. “Otherwise, it could be viewed as an attempt to stifle communication and suppress freedom of expression.”

Durov, who is a Russian-born but holds French and UAE citizenship, has been a significant figure in the tech industry.

His company, Telegram, which he founded in 2013, is renowned for its commitment to privacy and has become a crucial platform for global communication, including in politically volatile regions.

The Russian government has emphasized its readiness to provide assistance to Durov, although it acknowledges the complexity of the situation.

Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates, where Durov also holds citizenship, has requested urgent diplomatic support from French officials and is closely monitoring the case.

Durov’s arrest comes at a time of heightened geopolitical tension between Russia and France. Relations have been strained by France’s strong stance against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its support for Ukraine’s sovereignty.

This backdrop has fueled speculation that Durov’s detention might be more about political maneuvering than genuine legal concerns.

According to reports, Durov had traveled to Paris from Baku, Azerbaijan, where he was rumored to have had meetings, including speculative discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin—claims that Kremlin officials have since denied.

Telegram, which boasts over 800 million users globally, including many government and military officials on both sides of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, has denied any wrongdoing.

The company has consistently defended its platform’s neutrality and commitment to user privacy.

As the situation unfolds, Russia’s challenge to the legitimacy of France’s legal actions underscores the broader tensions between the two nations and raises questions about the intersection of politics and international legal processes.

The outcome of this case may have significant implications not only for Durov but also for the broader landscape of digital freedom and diplomatic relations.

Continue Reading

Trending