Connect with us

Markets

Delay in Deepwater Projects Threatens Oil Reserves Target

Published

on

Lekki Deep Seaport
  • Delay in Deepwater Projects Threatens Oil Reserves Target

The lack of final investment decisions on seven offshore deepwater oilfield projects in the country poses a threat to the country’s target of 40 billion barrels of crude oil reserves by 2020, our correspondent has learnt.

The nation’s crude oil reserves fell to 36.74 billion barrels in 2016 from 37.06 billion barrels in 2015 and 37.45 billion barrels in 2014, according to the Department of Petroleum Resources.

The Federal Government in 2010 set the target of 40 billion barrels of crude oil reserves and a production of four million barrels per day by 2020.

Last year, the Group Managing Director, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Dr Maikanti Baru, said to achieve the target, the country would need an increment of at least one billion barrels in reserves year-on-year up until 2020 and a half of a million barrels in incremental production capacity per day within the same time frame.

A petroleum expert, Mr Bala Zakka, who expressed concerns about the delayed deepwater projects, told our correspondent that international oil companies would continue to invest in the nation’s oil and gas industry if the investment climate was good.

He said, “Practically, once there is a delay in what we call drilling or exploration campaign, the ability to build reserves will also be affected because when you embark on exploration campaign, the essence is to build up reserves.

“So, the moment there is a delay or suspension of exploration activities, it will be difficult to increase reserves, which are not good for the country because the volume of reserves you have also play a role in the kind of production quota that would be allocated to the country by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries.”

Industry analysts have attributed the lack of the FID to the delay in passing the Petroleum Industry Bill, the proposed review by the Federal Government of the existing Production Sharing Contracts and the steep fall in global oil prices.

Projects without the FID are Shell’s Bonga South-West and Aparo (225,000bpd) and Bonga North (100,000bpd), Eni’s Zabazaba-Etan (120,000bpd), Chevron’s Nsiko (100,000bpd) and ExxonMobil’s Bosi (140,000bpd), Satellite Field Development Phase 2 (80,000bpd) and Uge (110,000bpd).

The 125,000-bpd Usan deepwater field started production in February 2012, and since then, no major oil field has come on stream in the country.

The 40,000-bpd Bonga North-West field and 50,000-bpd.Bonga Phase 3 project, which are extensions of Shell’s Bonga deepwater field, came online in August 2014 and September 2015. ExxonMobil’s Erha North Phase 2 project started production in October 2015

Total’s $16bn Egina deepwater oilfield project, whose Floating Production, Storage and Offloading vessel is undergoing integration in Lagos, is expected to achieve first oil in the fourth quarter of this year. It will add 200,000 barrels per day to Nigeria’s oil production.

The Managing Director, Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company, Bayo Ojulari, said on Tuesday that Royal Dutch Shell and its partners would decide next year on whether to go ahead with the development of Nigeria’s Bonga South-West offshore oilfield.

Reuters quoted him as saying that Shell was negotiating a production sharing contract with the Nigerian government, which would determine the viability of the project.

“A time frame for the FID will be announced after the conclusion of commercial discussions with [the Nigerian] government. The discussions are ongoing and may be concluded soon,” Ojulari was quoted by S&P Global Platts as saying in a company statement.

Developing Bonga South-West was billed to cost $10bn, according to the NNPC estimates.

The bulk of Bonga South-West’s resources are located in an area referred to as Oil Mining Lease 118 but it also extends into the OMLs 132 and 140, areas operated by Chevron, where the field is called Aparo.

Other partners in the project are France’s Total, Italy’s Eni and South Africa’s Sasol Petroleum.

Faced with declining oil revenue, Nigeria announced in 2015 that it planned to review the PSCs with foreign companies, proposing an increase in royalty rates for terrains beyond 1,000 meters, from zero to three per cent, and a royalty rate of eight per cent for output of up to 50,000 bpd.

The Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative said last week that the failure to review the PSC agreement with foreign companies cost the Nigerian government $35bn in revenue between 2015 and 2017.

Under the PSCs, the NNPC holds the concessions, and the outside drillers fund development of the mostly deepwater offshore blocks and recover their costs from the production after royalty payments.

The Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the United States’ Energy Department, noted that several planned deepwater projects in Nigeria had been repeatedly pushed back because of regulatory uncertainty.

It said some draft versions of the PIB had prompted questions about the commercial viability of deepwater projects under the proposed changes to fiscal terms.

The EIA said, “Deepwater projects have typically included more favourable fiscal terms than onshore/shallow water projects, but the PIB, if passed into law, is expected to increase the government’s share of production revenue coming from deepwater projects.

“As a result of the uncertainty, the IOCs have sanctioned (reached a final investment decision) on only one of eight planned deepwater oil projects. Both sanctioned and unsanctioned deepwater oil projects have the potential to bring online almost 1.1 million bpd of new production over the next five or more years, however, only 200,000b/d has reached the critical development milestone.”

The agency noted that the Federal Government took measures to attract investment in deepwater acreage in the 1990s to boost production capacity and to diversify the location of the country’s oil fields.

It said to encourage investment in deepwater areas, involving higher capital and operating costs, the government offered the PSCs in which the IOCs received a greater share of revenue as the water depth increased.

Is the CEO and Founder of Investors King Limited. He is a seasoned foreign exchange research analyst and a published author on Yahoo Finance, Business Insider, Nasdaq, Entrepreneur.com, Investorplace, and other prominent platforms. With over two decades of experience in global financial markets, Olukoya is well-recognized in the industry.

Continue Reading
Comments

Crude Oil

Possible Middle East War Tension Buoys Oil Prices

Published

on

Crude oil

Oil prices rose on Friday and settled with their biggest weekly gains in over a year on the threat of a wider war in the Middle East following Israel and Iran’s conflict.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigerian crude oil is priced, rose 43 cents (0.6%) to settle at $78.05 per barrel while the US West Texas Intermediate 9WTI) crude oil gained 67 cents (0.9%) to close at $74.38 per barrel.

Israel has vowed to strike Iran for launching a barrage of missiles at Israel on Tuesday after Israel assassinated the leader of Iran-backed Hezbollah a week ago.

Meanwhile, gains were limited as US President Joe Biden discouraged Israel from targeting Iranian oil facilities.

The development has oil analysts warning clients of the potential ramifications of a broader war in the Middle East.

Iranian oil tankers have started moving away from Kharg Island, Iran’s biggest oil export terminal, amid fears of an imminent attack by Israel on the most important crude export infrastructure in Iran.

Market analysts say that the OPEC spare capacity, concentrated in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), would compensate for an Iranian loss of supply.

They noted that an even more significant disruption to supply from the Middle East could lead to triple-digit oil prices, but nothing suggests that attacks on oil infrastructure in other producers in the region or the closure of the Strait of Hormuz are low-probability events.

JPMorgan commodities analysts wrote that an attack on Iranian energy facilities would not be Israel’s preferred course of action.

However, low levels of global oil inventories suggest that prices are set to be elevated until the conflict is resolved, they added.

Iran is a member of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, OPEC+ with production of around 3.2 million barrels per day or 3 per cent of global output.

On Friday, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appeared in public for the first time since his country launched the missile attack and said the country will not relent.

Supply fears have also eased in Libya as the country’s eastern-based government lifted the force majeure on output and exports just hours after a deal was reached for two compromise candidates to head the country’s central bank, which controls the country’s oil revenues.

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Prices Surge as Fears of Israeli Strike on Iran Escalate

Published

on

Oil surged as markets braced for the possibility that Israel could strike Iran’s energy industry, the latest potential escalation of a conflict that began almost one year ago when Hamas attacked Israel.

Global benchmark Brent crude climbed near $77 after US President Joe Biden indicated Israel was weighing an attack on Iran’s oil infrastructure as a response to Iran’s missile attack on Israel, itself a response to Israel’s killing of leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas and an Iranian general.

When asked if he would support a new Israeli attack, Biden responded “we’re discussing that.”

Israel meanwhile continued to strike Lebanon, killing nine people at a medical site in central Beirut, local authorities said, among other targets. Israel has said it’s targeting Hezbollah militants while Lebanese officials said the attacks have killed more than 1,300 people and displaced over a million.

Tel Aviv also has warned civilians in southern Lebanon to evacuate as Israeli forces expand a ground invasion there. —Margaret Sutherlin

Continue Reading

Crude Oil

Oil Adds $3 Per Barrel as Israel, Iran Conflict Spike Fears on Supply

Published

on

Crude Oil - Investors King

Oil prices gained $3 on Thursday as concerns mounted that a widening regional conflict in the Middle East could disrupt global crude flows with Israel reportedly planning to target Iran’s oil and gas infrastructure.

Brent crude oil, against which Nigerian oil is priced, inched higher by $3.72, or 5.03 percent to close at $77.62 a barrel while the US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude appreciated by $3.61, or 5.15 percent to $73.71.

Prices have continued to rise in the aftermath of Iran’s Tuesday attack on Israel, which involved around 200 missiles.

Following the missile barrage, Israel’s ground troops clashed with Hezbollah forces in southern Lebanon, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowing separate revenge on Iran.

The latest round of escalation was sparked by Israel’s sanctioned elimination of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah and Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh.

The tension was further sparked after US President Joe Biden indicated that there is a possibility of Israel striking Iran’s oil facilities.

This is after Israeli officials said on Wednesday that Israel could target Iran’s strategic energy infrastructure, including oil and gas rigs or nuclear installations, which would have the biggest economic impact, and send shockwaves through oil markets.

Iran is a member of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) with production of around 3.2 million barrels per day or 3 percent of global output.

Market analysts also raised concerns that such escalation could prompt Iran to block the Strait of Hormuz or attack Saudi infrastructure as it did in 2019. The strait is a key logistical chokepoint through which 20 percent of daily oil supply passes.

The market will also weigh development coming from Libya as oil production resumed after more than a month of suspended output due to a political standoff between the eastern and western administrations in the North African OPEC producer.

The end of this Libyan crisis will lead to the return of a few hundred thousand barrels of crude per day to the market.

Also, US crude inventories rose by 3.9 million barrels to 417 million barrels in the week ended September 27, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) said on Wednesday.

A rise in inventories shows that the US market is well-supplied and can withstand any disruptions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement




Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending