Ripple Court Case: SEC’s Failure To Produce External Communication Evidence Could Lead To Monetary Sanctions

The never-ending legal battle between the U.S. SEC and Ripple has taken a new turn, as Ripple Labs filed a motion that compels the United States Securities and Exchange Commission to produce evidence of internal documents and communication regarding dealings with other cryptocurrencies like BTC, ETH, and Ripple’s XRP.

The plaintiff, SEC, has been intsructed twice to turn over the evidence but the government body has been adamant and refused to produce the documents despite Judge Netburn’s insistence.

“The Court has ordered the SEC to “search all of the relevant repositories for documents and discovery” for communications between the SEC and external third parties relating to XRP, bitcoin or ether. After the SEC resisted, the Court reaffirmed that “the SEC must produce communications with third-parties, including external agencies and market participants.”

“Despite that repeated instruction, the SEC persists in refusing to search an obvious repository for responsive evidence on external communications”, the defendant said.

Ripple’s motion asks the court to order the SEC to search for and produce documents about bitcoin, ether, and XRP from the SEC’s FinHub electronic mailbox, and produce the SEC’s trading policies related to digital assets and virtual currencies no later than June 18, 2021.

Given the SEC’s most recent request to the court – to extend the deadlines for both fact and expert discovery by 60 days – it seems that the SEC is looking to stall the case, Ripple argued.

“The SEC has repeatedly delayed its production while telling Judge Torres that the ordered discovery was “irrelevant and needless,” and asking the Court to extend the discovery deadlines based, inter alia, on the fact that Defendants “have raised a number of concerns regarding the SEC’s review and production of internal documents and communications responsive to Judge Netburn’s April 6, 2021 order.”

“In other words, the SEC cites its own delay as a reason for extending the schedule. The only way to solve this problem is with a strict deadline”, the motion stated.

It should be noted that the Judge can order monetary sanctions against the Securities and Exchange Commission or even dismiss the case altogether should the plaintiff remain uncooperative regarding the ordered discovery. A dismissal, however, is highly unlikely at this stage.

In its request to extend the deadlines, the SEC admits the “defendants do not consent to the SEC’s request because they contend that the SEC had sufficient time to investigate this matter before filing suit and because Ripple wants to move for summary judgment as soon as possible.”

In addition to this SEC’s request, both parties have filed a joint motion to extend the time until June 9, 2021, to meet and confer regarding document redactions and sealing of certain exhibits hoping “to avoid burdening the Court with unnecessary disputes”.